Search all medical codes

Psychiatric evaluation of hospital records, other psychiatric reports, psychometric and/or projective tests, and other accumulated data for medical diagnostic purposes

CPT4 code

Name of the Procedure:

Psychiatric evaluation of hospital records, other psychiatric reports, psychometric and/or projective tests, and other accumulated data for medical diagnostic purposes, commonly known as integrated psychiatric evaluation or comprehensive psychiatric review.

Summary

An integrated psychiatric evaluation involves a thorough review of a patient's past and present medical records, other psychiatric assessments, psychometric tests, projective tests, and accumulated data. This evaluation helps healthcare providers understand a patient's mental health conditions and aids in accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.

Purpose

The procedure addresses the need for a comprehensive understanding of a patient's psychiatric history and current mental health status. The goals are to accurately diagnose mental health disorders, devise an effective treatment plan, and monitor progress over time.

Indications

  • Persistent or severe mental health symptoms (e.g., depression, anxiety, psychosis).
  • Previous inconclusive psychiatric assessments.
  • Complex psychiatric conditions requiring detailed evaluation.
  • Monitoring the efficacy of current treatment plans.

Preparation

  • Patients may need to provide consent for the review of their medical records and previous tests.
  • No specific fasting or medication adjustments are usually required.
  • Gathering all relevant psychiatric and medical records and reports.

Procedure Description

  1. Data Collection: Collate all relevant documents, including hospital records, psychiatric reports, and test results.
  2. Review and Analysis: A mental health professional reviews the accumulated data to identify patterns, inconsistencies, and key insights.
  3. Psychometric Testing: May involve interpreting results from standardized psychometric tests to assess cognitive functions and psychological conditions.
  4. Projective Testing: Analysis of projective tests that provide insights into a patient's unconscious processes.
  5. Integration: Synthesize data from various sources to form a comprehensive picture of the patient's mental health.

Tools and Equipment:

  • Medical and psychiatric records.
  • Standardized psychometric tests.
  • Projective tests like the Rorschach Inkblot Test or Thematic Apperception Test.

Anesthesia or Sedation: Not applicable.

Duration

The entire evaluation can take from a few hours to several days, depending on the volume and complexity of the data.

Setting

Typically performed in a hospital, outpatient clinic, or psychiatric evaluation center.

Personnel

  • Psychiatrist or clinical psychologist.
  • Mental health professionals, such as psychiatric nurses or case managers.
  • Administrative staff for data collection.

Risks and Complications

  • Minimal physical risk involved.
  • Emotional discomfort or distress when discussing past experiences or symptoms.
  • Potential misinterpretation of historical data if not carefully reviewed and integrated.

Benefits

  • Accurate and comprehensive diagnosis of psychiatric conditions.
  • Tailored treatment plans based on a thorough understanding of the patient's history.
  • Improved patient outcomes through targeted therapeutic interventions.
  • Benefits are often realized once a new or revised treatment plan is implemented effectively.

Recovery

  • No physical recovery required.
  • Emotional support and follow-up appointments may be necessary for ongoing evaluation and treatment adjustments.

Alternatives

  • Isolated psychiatric evaluations focusing only on current symptoms.
  • Basic mental health screenings without integrating extensive historical data.
  • Pros: Quicker and less resource-intensive.
  • Cons: May not provide a detailed or comprehensive understanding of complex psychiatric conditions.

Patient Experience

  • Patients might feel anxious or uncomfortable during the evaluation, especially when discussing sensitive or traumatic experiences.
  • Generally, the process is non-invasive and involves a series of interviews and assessments.
  • Comfort measures include a supportive and empathetic approach by healthcare providers.

Similar Codes