449 Form

Chat with GenHealth to automate any policy or prior auth task.


449

Indications

(1) Does the request meet this criterion: Policy: Commercial? 
(2) Does the request meet this criterion: Coding Information? 
(3) Does the request meet this criterion: Information Pertaining to All Policies? 
(4) Does the request meet this criterion: Policy: Medicare? 
(5) Does the request meet this criterion: Authorization Information? 

YesNoN/A
YesNoN/A
YesNoN/A

Sign up to see the rest of the questions

Unlock the remaining questions and the full coverage workflow.

Sign up for free
Effective Date

NA

Last Reviewed

NA

Original Document

  Reference



1

Medical Policy Vertebral Fracture Assessment with Densitometry or Biomechanical Computed Tomography
Table of Contents
• Policy: Commercial • Coding Information
• Information Pertaining to All Policies
• Policy: Medicare • Description
• References
• Authorization Information • Policy History

Policy Number: 449 BCBSA Reference Number: 6.01.44 (For Plan internal use only) NCD/LCD: NA Related Policies
• Medicare Advantage Management, #132 • Bone Mineral Density Studies, #450 • Whole Body Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry to Determine Body Composition, #577

Policy
Commercial Members: Managed Care (HMO and POS), PPO, and Indemnity

Screening for vertebral fractures using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA or DXA) or biomechanical computed tomography is INVESTIGATIONAL.

Prior Authorization Information
Inpatient • For services described in this policy, precertification/preauthorization IS REQUIRED for all products if the procedure is performed inpatient.
Outpatient • For services described in this policy, see below for products where prior authorization might be required if the procedure is performed outpatient.


Outpatient Commercial Managed Care (HMO and POS) This is not a covered service. Commercial PPO and Indemnity This is not a covered service. CPT Codes / HCPCS Codes / ICD Codes Inclusion or exclusion of a code does not constitute or imply member coverage or provider reimbursement. Please refer to the member’s contract benefits in effect at the time of service to determine coverage or non-coverage as it applies to an individual member.

2 Providers should report all services using the most up-to-date industry-standard procedure, revenue, and diagnosis codes, including modifiers where applicable.

The following codes are included below for informational purposes only; this is not an all-inclusive list. The following CPT code is considered investigational for Commercial Members: Managed Care (HMO and POS), PPO, and Indemnity:

CPT Codes CPT codes: Code Description 77085 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), bone density study, 1 or more sites; axial skeleton (eg, hips, pelvis, spine), including vertebral fracture assessment

The following CPT code is considered investigational for Commercial Members: Managed Care (HMO and POS), PPO, Indemnity, Medicare HMO Blue and Medicare PPO Blue:

CPT Codes CPT codes: Code Description 77086 Vertebral fracture assessment via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) 0743T Bone strength and fracture risk using finite element analysis of functional data and bone mineral density (BMD), with concurrent vertebral fracture assessment, utilizing data from a computed tomography scan, retrieval and transmission of the scan data, measurement of bone strength and BMD and classification of any vertebral fractures, with overall fracture-risk assessment, interpretation and report

Description Diagnosis Only 20% to 30% of vertebral fractures are recognized clinically; the rest are discovered incidentally on lateral spine radiographs or other imaging studies.1, Lateral spine radiographs have not been recommended as a component of risk assessment for osteoporosis because of the cost, radiation exposure, and the fact that the radiograph would require a separate procedure in addition to the bone mineral density (BMD) study using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, several densitometers with specialized software can perform vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in conjunction with DXA. The lateral spine scan is performed by using a rotating arm. Depending on the densitometer used, the patient can either stay in the supine position after the bone density study or is required to move to the left decubitus position. Vertebral fracture assessment differs from radiologic detection of fractures because VFA uses a lower radiation exposure and can detect only fractures, while traditional radiograph images can detect other bone and soft tissue abnormalities in addition to spinal fractures. Manufacturers have also referred to this procedure as instant vertebral assessment, radiographic vertebral assessment, dual-energy vertebral assessment, or lateral vertebral assessment.

For both lateral spine radiographs and images with densitometry, vertebral fractures are assessed visually. A number of grading systems have been proposed, and the Genant semiquantitative method is commonly used. This system grades deformities from I to III, with grade I (mild) representing a 20% to 24% reduction in vertebral height, grade II (moderate) representing a 25% to 39% reduction in height, and grade III (severe) representing a 40% or greater reduction in height. The location of the deformity within the vertebrae may also be noted. For example, if only the mid-height of the vertebrae is affected, the deformity is defined as an endplate deformity; if both the anterior and mid-heights are deformed, it is a wedge deformity; and if the entire vertebrae is deformed, it is classed as a crush deformity. A vertebral deformity of at least 20% loss in height is typically considered a fracture. Accurate interpretation of both lateral spine radiographs and VFA imaging depends on radiologic training. Thus, device location and availability of appropriately trained personnel may influence diagnostic accuracy.

3 Biomechanical computed tomography (BCT) is another method of performing VFA which also minimizes radiation exposure.2, Previously obtained CT scans can be used for BCT analysis in many cases. Exceptions include spinal images performed with contrast and images in which metal is present in the transverse plane of the bone of interest. Analysis is performed in a centralized laboratory, to which clinicians must send CT scans. The BCT calculation involves a non-linear finite element analysis to simulate a fracture event, with outputs including T-score and Z-score of the femoral neck and hip, femoral strength, vertebral strength, vertebral trabecular volume, and vertebral Z-score. Patients are classified as high risk if fragile bone strength (defined as ≤3000 to 6500 Newtons depending on patient sex and location [hip or spine]) or osteoporosis at the hip or spine is found. The classification of increased risk is assigned if low bone strength or low bone mass is identified at the hip or spine.

Summary Description Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) with densitometry is a technique to assess vertebral fractures at the same time as bone mineral density (BMD), using additional software with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The addition of VFA to BMD may augment diagnostic information on fracture risk. Another method of determining vertebral fracture risk is biomechanical computed tomography (BCT), which evaluates both bone density and strength.

Summary of Evidence For individuals who are at risk of having vertebral fractures but are not known to have them who receive vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) with densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the evidence includes diagnostic accuracy studies and subgroup re-analyses of treatment studies. Relevant outcomes are test accuracy, test validity, and morbid events. There is a lack of direct evidence from screening trials that use of densitometry with VFA improves health outcomes. Because direct evidence was not available, a chain of evidence was sought. Evidence was examined on the diagnostic accuracy of VFA in non-osteoporotic patients (ie, those not already eligible for treatment), the ability of VFA to identify patients for treatment who would not otherwise be identified, and the effectiveness of treatment in this population. Diagnostic accuracy studies have reported variable findings; recent studies have suggested higher diagnostic accuracy of VFA overall compared with standard radiographs than older studies. Studies have found that VFA can identify patients without osteoporosis who may be appropriate candidates for treatment according to recommendations from the Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation. However, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of treatment in this population. No treatment data have been published on patients whose vertebral fractures were identified using VFA software with densitometry. The evidence is insufficient to determine that the technology results in an improvement in the net health outcome.

For individuals who are at risk of having vertebral fractures but are not known to have them who receive VFA with biomechanical computed tomography (BCT), the evidence includes retrospective studies. Relevant outcomes are test accuracy, test validity, and morbid events. The available studies have demonstrated that BCT has similar efficacy to DXA in detecting osteoporosis. There is a lack of direct evidence from clinical trials that the use of BCT for VFA improves health outcomes. No treatment data have been published on patients whose vertebral fractures were identified using BCT. The evidence is insufficient to determine that the technology results in an improvement in the net health outcome.

Policy History
Date Action 11/2025 Annual policy review. Policy updated with literature review through July 19, 2025; reference added. Policy statement unchanged. 5/2025 Medicare information removed. See MP #132 Medicare Advantage Management for local coverage determination and national coverage determination reference. 3/2025 Annual policy review. Policy updated with literature review through August 21, 2024. References added. Investigational indication for biomechanical computed tomography added. Clarified coding information. Effective 3/1/2025.

4 11/2023 Annual policy review. Description, summary, and references updated. Policy statements unchanged. 12/2022 Clarified coding information. 10/2022 Annual policy review. Description, summary, and references updated. Policy statements unchanged. 10/2021 Annual policy review. Description, summary, and references updated. Policy statements unchanged. 11/2020 Annual policy review. Description, summary, and references updated. Policy statements unchanged. 10/2019 Annual policy review. Description, summary, and references updated. Policy statements unchanged. 11/2018 Annual policy review. Description, summary, and references updated. Policy statements unchanged. 10/2017 Annual policy review. New references added. 10/2016 Annual policy review. New references added. 1/2015 Clarified coding information. 2/2013 Annual policy review. New references added. 11/2011- 4/2012 Medical policy ICD 10 remediation: Formatting, editing and coding updates.
No changes to policy statements.
9/2011 Reviewed - Medical Policy Group - Urology and Obstetrics/Gynecology. No changes to policy statements. 1/2011 Annual policy review. No changes to policy statements. 10/2010 Reviewed - Medical Policy Group - Urology and Obstetrics/Gynecology. No changes to policy statements. 10/2009 Reviewed - Medical Policy Group - Urology and Obstetrics/Gynecology. No changes to policy statements. 10/2008 Reviewed - Medical Policy Group - Urology and Obstetrics/Gynecology. No changes to policy statements. 10/2007 Reviewed - Medical Policy Group - Urology and Obstetrics/Gynecology. No changes to policy statements. 8/2007 Annual policy review. No changes to policy statements. Information Pertaining to All Blue Cross Blue Shield Medical Policies Click on any of the following terms to access the relevant information: Medical Policy Terms of Use Managed Care Guidelines Indemnity/PPO Guidelines Clinical Exception Process Medical Technology Assessment Guidelines

References

  1. Alsoof D, Anderson G, McDonald CL, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Vertebral Compression Fracture. Am J Med. Jul 2022; 135(7): 815-821. PMID 35307360
  2. Keaveny TM, Clarke BL, Cosman F, et al. Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT) for clinical assessment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. Jun 2020; 31(6): 1025-1048. PMID 32335687
  3. Malgo F, Hamdy NAT, Ticheler CHJM, et al. Value and potential limitations of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) compared to conventional spine radiography: experience from a fracture liaison service (FLS) and a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. Oct 2017; 28(10): 2955-2965. PMID 28842721
  4. Lee JH, Lee YK, Oh SH, et al. A systematic review of diagnostic accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in postmenopausal women and elderly men. Osteoporos Int. May 2016; 27(5): 1691-
  5. PMID 26782682

5

  1. Domiciano DS, Figueiredo CP, Lopes JB, et al. Vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry: a valid tool to detect vertebral fractures in community-dwelling older adults in a population-based survey. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). May 2013; 65(5): 809-15. PMID 23212896
  2. Ferrar L, Jiang G, Clowes JA, et al. Comparison of densitometric and radiographic vertebral fracture assessment using the algorithm-based qualitative (ABQ) method in postmenopausal women at low and high risk of fracture. J Bone Miner Res. Jan 2008; 23(1): 103-11. PMID 17892377
  3. Binkley N, Krueger D, Gangnon R, et al. Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. Dec 2005; 16(12): 1513-8. PMID 15834512
  4. LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, et al. The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. Oct 2022; 33(10): 2049-2102. PMID 35478046
  5. Gill SM, Hassan A. Routine Use of Lateral Vertebral Assessment With DXA Scan for Detection of Silent But Debilitating Vertebral Fractures. Clin Nucl Med. Feb 01 2023; 48(2): 107-111. PMID 36607360
  6. Yang J, Mao Y, Nieves JW. Identification of prevalent vertebral fractures using Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA) in asymptomatic postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone. Jul 2020; 136: 115358. PMID 32268210
  7. Kanterewicz E, Puigoriol E, García-Barrionuevo J, et al. Prevalence of vertebral fractures and minor vertebral deformities evaluated by DXA-assisted vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in a population- based study of postmenopausal women: the FRODOS study. Osteoporos Int. May 2014; 25(5): 1455-
  8. PMID 24599272
  9. Mrgan M, Mohammed A, Gram J. Combined vertebral assessment and bone densitometry increases the prevalence and severity of osteoporosis in patients referred to DXA scanning. J Clin Densitom. 2013; 16(4): 549-53. PMID 23769657
  10. El Maghraoui A, Mounach A, Rezqi A, et al. Vertebral fracture assessment in asymptomatic men and its impact on management. Bone. Apr 2012; 50(4): 853-7. PMID 22240446
  11. El Maghraoui A, Rezqi A, Mounach A, et al. Systematic vertebral fracture assessment in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Bone. Jan 2013; 52(1): 176-80. PMID 23017663
  12. Jager PL, Jonkman S, Koolhaas W, et al. Combined vertebral fracture assessment and bone mineral density measurement: a new standard in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in academic populations. Osteoporos Int. Apr 2011; 22(4): 1059-68. PMID 20571773
  13. Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, et al. Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. JAMA. Dec 1998; 280(24): 2077-82. PMID 9875874
  14. Quandt SA, Thompson DE, Schneider DL, et al. Effect of alendronate on vertebral fracture risk in women with bone mineral density T scores of-1.6 to -2.5 at the femoral neck: the Fracture Intervention Trial. Mayo Clin Proc. Mar 2005; 80(3): 343-9. PMID 15757015
  15. Kanis JA, Barton IP, Johnell O. Risedronate decreases fracture risk in patients selected solely on the basis of prior vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int. May 2005; 16(5): 475-82. PMID 15875093
  16. Bhoopalam N, Campbell SC, Moritz T, et al. Intravenous zoledronic acid to prevent osteoporosis in a veteran population with multiple risk factors for bone loss on androgen deprivation therapy. J Urol. Nov 2009; 182(5): 2257-64. PMID 19758618
  17. Greenspan SL, Nelson JB, Trump DL, et al. Effect of once-weekly oral alendronate on bone loss in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. Mar 20 2007; 146(6): 416-24. PMID 17371886
  18. Izzy M, Addissie BD, Arab JP, et al. Triple-Phase Computed Tomography May Replace Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scan for Evaluation of Osteoporosis in Liver Transplant Candidates. Liver Transpl. Feb 2021; 27(3): 341-348. PMID 33098253
  19. Adams AL, Fischer H, Kopperdahl DL, et al. Osteoporosis and Hip Fracture Risk From Routine Computed Tomography Scans: The Fracture, Osteoporosis, and CT Utilization Study (FOCUS). J Bone Miner Res. Jul 2018; 33(7): 1291-1301. PMID 29665068
  20. Fidler JL, Murthy NS, Khosla S, et al. Comprehensive Assessment of Osteoporosis and Bone Fragility with CT Colonography. Radiology. Jan 2016; 278(1): 172-80. PMID 26200602
  21. Weber NK, Fidler JL, Keaveny TM, et al. Validation of a CT-derived method for osteoporosis screening in IBD patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT enterography. Am J Gastroenterol. Mar 2014; 109(3): 401-8. PMID 24445572
  22. Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, et al. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE

6 GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS - 2016. Endocr Pract. Sep 02 2016; 22(Suppl 4): 1-42. PMID 27662240

  1. Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, et al. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS-2020 UPDATE. Endocr Pract. May 2020; 26(Suppl 1): 1-46. PMID 32427503
  2. Qaseem A, Forciea MA, McLean RM, et al. Treatment of Low Bone Density or Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures in Men and Women: A Clinical Practice Guideline Update From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. Jun 06 2017; 166(11): 818-839. PMID 28492856
  3. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria, Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Density. 2022; https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69358/Narrative/. Accessed July 19, 2025.
  4. International Society for Clinical Densitometry. 2023 ISCD Official Positions Adult. 2023; https://iscd.org/official-positions-2023/. Accessed July 19, 2025.
  5. Eastell R, Rosen CJ, Black DM, et al. Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. May 2019;104(5):1595-1622.
  6. Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: the 2021 position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. Sep 01 2021; 28(9): 973-997. PMID 34448749
  7. Nicholson WK, Silverstein M, Wong JB, et al. Screening for Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. Feb 11 2025; 333(6): 498-508. PMID 39808425
Book a walkthrough

Walk through this policy with us

Review how this policy can be converted into cited criteria, prior authorization checks, and operational automation.