CG.CP.MP.03 Concert Infectious Disease: Dermatologic Testing Form
CG.CP.MP.03 Concert Infectious Disease: Dermatologic Testing 2025.1 Date of Last Revision: 11/2024
CENTENE Corporation
Coding Implications Revision log
CONCERT INFECTIOUS DISEASE: DERMATOLOGIC TESTING
See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.
OVERVIEW
Fungal infection of the nails (onychomycosis) is common. Toenails are more likely than fingernails to be affected. Onychomycosis is characterized by discoloration, splitting, deformation, and brittleness of the nails and can also affect the surrounding skin. Non-fungal infections and non-infectious nail conditions, such as nail dystrophy, can mimic onychomycosis. Confirmatory testing should be performed to confirm fungal infection before initiating treatment to prevent inappropriate use of antifungal medications. Available testing methods include microscopy, culture, and molecular (PCR-based) techniques.
This policy is intended for use in the outpatient setting.
POLICY REFERENCE TABLE
| Criteria Sections | Example Tests (Labs) | Ref |
|---|---|---|
| Microscopy/Peroxidase Tests for Onychomycosis | Fungus Stain (LabCorp) | 1, 2 |
| KOH Prep (Pacific Medical) | ||
| Fungal Culture for Onychomycosis | Culture, Fungus, Miscellaneous (Quest Diagnostics) | |
| Fungus (Mycology) Culture/Dermatophyte Culture (LabCorp) | ||
| Fungal Isolate Identification (Quest Diagnostics) | ||
| Culture-Independent Molecular Tests (NAAT/PCR) for Onychomycosis | Nail-ID (Vikor Scientific) |
CRITERIA
It is the policy of health plans affiliated with Centene Corporation® that the specific tests noted below are medically necessary when meeting the related criteria:
Fungal Culture for Onychomycosis
I. Fungal culture for onychomycosis (presumptive and/or definitive) are considered medically necessary when:
A. The member/enrollee shows signs or symptoms of onychomycosis (e.g., nails that are discolored, deformed, brittle, and/or foul-smelling; subungual debris; separation of the nail from the nail bed), AND
B. Results of testing would influence the member/enrollee’s clinical management.II. Current evidence does not support the use of fungal culture for onychomycosis (presumptive and/or definitive) for all other indications.
Culture-Independent Molecular Tests (NAAT/PCR) for Onychomycosis
I. Current evidence does not support the use of culture-independent molecular tests (NAAT/PCR) for onychomycosis for all indications.
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
Microscopy/Peroxidase Tests for Onychomycosis
British Association of Dermatologists
In their 2014 onychomycosis guidelines, the British Association of Dermatologists state the following:
“Laboratory confirmation of a clinical diagnosis of tinea unguium should be obtained before starting treatment. This is important for several reasons: to eliminate nonfungal dermatological conditions from the diagnosis; to detect mixed infections; and to diagnose patients with less responsive forms of onychomycosis, such as toenail infections due to T. rubrum.” (p. 942)
“Traditionally, laboratory detection and identification of dermatophytes consists of culture and microscopy.” (p. 942)
American Academy of Family Physicians
In their 2021 rapid evidence review of onychomycosis, the AAFP listed the common signs and symptoms of onychomycosis, including: nails that are discolored, deformed, hypertrophic, or hyperkeratotic; subungual debris; separation from the nail bed; brittle nails that break easily or crumble; and nails that are foul smelling. (p. 360)
Fungal Culture for Onychomycosis
British Association of Dermatologists
In their 2014 onychomycosis guidelines, the British Association of Dermatologists state the following:
“Laboratory confirmation of a clinical diagnosis of tinea unguium should be obtained before starting treatment. This is important for several reasons: to eliminate nonfungal dermatological conditions from the diagnosis; to detect mixed infections; and to diagnose patients with less responsive forms of onychomycosis, such as toenail infections due to T. rubrum.” (p. 942)
“Traditionally, laboratory detection and identification of dermatophytes consists of culture and microscopy.” (p. 942)
American Academy of Family Physicians
In their 2021 rapid evidence review of onychomycosis, the AAFP listed the common signs and symptoms of onychomycosis, including: nails that are discolored, deformed, hypertrophic, or hyperkeratotic; subungual debris; separation from the nail bed; brittle nails that break easily or crumble; and nails that are foul smelling. (p. 360)
Culture-Independent Molecular Tests (NAAT/PCR) for Onychomycosis
British Association of Dermatologists
In their 2014 onychomycosis guidelines, the British Association of Dermatologists state the following:
“It appears that real-time PCR significantly increased the detection rate of dermatophytes compared with culture. However, PCR may detect nonpathogenic or dead fungus, which could limit its use in identifying the true pathogen. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, which identifies fungal ribosomal DNA, is very helpful for defining whether the disease is caused by repeat infection or another fungal strain when there is a lack of response to treatment. However, this technique has not been implemented into routine clinical practice.” (p. 942)
American Academy of Family Physicians
In their 2021 rapid evidence review of onychomycosis, the AAFP states the following:
“A potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparation with direct microscopy is the preferred diagnostic method [for onychomycosis] because it is highly specific, has rapid results, and is cost-effective. Diagnosis by KOH preparation alone is sufficient for treatment initiation. However, if KOH results are negative and there is high clinical suspicion for onychomycosis, other testing may be performed to confirm the diagnosis.” (p. 361)
Coding Implications
This clinical policy references Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®). CPT® is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association. All CPT codes and descriptions are copyrighted 2023, American Medical Association. All rights reserved. CPT codes and CPT descriptions are from the current manuals and those included herein are not intended to be all-inclusive and are included for informational purposes only. Codes referenced in this clinical policy are for informational purposes only. Inclusion or exclusion of any codes does not guarantee coverage. Providers should reference the most up-to-date sources of professional coding guidance prior to the submission of claims for reimbursement of covered services.
| CPT® Codes | Description |
|---|---|
| 87101 | Culture, fungi (mold or yeast) isolation, with presumptive identification of isolates; skin, hair, or nail |
| 87102 | Culture, fungi (mold or yeast) isolation, with presumptive identification of isolates; other source (except blood) |
| 87106 | Culture, fungi, definitive identification, each organism; yeast |
| 87107 | Culture, fungi, definitive identification, each organism; mold |
| 87143 | Culture, typing; gas liquid chromatography (GLC) or high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method |
| 87147 | Culture, typing; immunologic method, other than immunofluorescence (eg, agglutination grouping), per antiserum |
| 87149 | Culture, typing; identification by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) probe, direct probe technique, per culture or isolate, each organism probed |
| 87150 | Culture, typing; identification by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) probe, amplified probe technique, per culture or isolate, each organism probed |
| 87206 | Smear, primary source with interpretation; fluorescent and/or acid fast stain for bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses or cell types |
| 87220 | Tissue examination by KOH slide of samples from skin, hair, or nails for fungi or ectoparasite ova or mites (eg, scabies) |
| 87480 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Candida species, direct probe technique |
| 87481 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Candida species, amplified probe technique |
| 87482 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Candida species, quantification |
| 87500 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); vancomycin resistance (eg, enterococcus species van A, van B), amplified probe technique |
| 87640 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Staphylococcus aureus, amplified probe technique |
| 87641 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin resistant, amplified probe technique |
| 87650 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Streptococcus, group A, direct probe technique |
| 87651 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Streptococcus, group A, amplified probe technique |
| 87652 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Streptococcus, group A, quantification |
| 87653 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); Streptococcus, group B, amplified probe technique |
| 87798 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), not otherwise specified; amplified probe technique, each organism |
| 87799 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), not otherwise specified; quantification, each organism |
| 87800 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), multiple organisms; direct probe(s) technique |
| 87801 | Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), multiple organisms; amplified probe(s) technique |
| Reviews, Revisions, and Approvals | Revision Date | Approval Date |
|---|---|---|
| Policy developed. Reviewed by external specialist. | 11/23 | 02/24 |
| Added “Lab” to policy title. Removed CPT and ICD-10 codes from policy reference table. Added CPT code table and moved the “coding implications” section. | 02/24 | |
| Corrected CPT codes descriptions in CPT code table. | 03/24 | |
| Annual review. Added policy number to header. For Fungal Culture for Onychomycosis and Microscopy/Peroxidase Tests for Onychomycosis, reworded policy statements from “may be considered medically necessary” to “are considered medically necessary.” | 11/24 | 2/25 |
Walk through this policy with us
Review how this policy can be converted into cited criteria, prior authorization checks, and operational automation.