Contact Lenses and Eyeglasses Form
Background for this Policy
Therapeutic soft hydrophilic contact lenses are made of poly-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and other flexible plastics. They are about 13 to 15 mm in diameter and cover the entire cornea. Hydrophilic contact lenses may be prescribed for the treatment of bullous keratopathy and other corneal disorders (bandage lenses). Prophylactic antibiotic eye-drops may be used with a bandage lens. Most therapeutic eye-drops can be used with hydrophilic lenses.
The Boston Scleral Lens is a fluid-ventilated scleral lens designed to enclose aqueous fluid over the corneal surface. The scleral lens acts as a corneal bandage, and can mask irregular astigmatism. The scleral lens rests entirely on the sclera and avoids all contact with the cornea. Thus, the scleral lens can be used by persons who are intolerant to standard (hard) contact lenses, which rest on the sensitive cornea. The Boston Scleral lens has a series of channels that aspirate tears into the fluid reservoir while preventing the formation of air bubbles in the reservoir.
Scleral shell (or shield) is a catchall term for different types of hard scleral contact lenses. A scleral shell fits over the entire exposed surface of the eye as opposed to a corneal contact lens that covers only the central nonwhite area encompassing the pupil and iris.
When an eye has been rendered sightless and shrunken by inflammatory disease, a scleral shell may, among other things, obviate the need for surgical enucleation and prosthetic implant and act to support the surrounding tissue. In such a case, the device serves essentially as an artificial eye.
Scleral shells are occasionally used in connection with artificial tears in the treatment of "dry eye" of diverse etiology. Tears ordinarily dry at a rapid rate, and are continually replaced by the lacrimal gland. When the lacrimal gland fails, the half-life of artificial tears may be greatly prolonged by the use of the scleral shell contact lens as a protective barrier against the drying action of the atmosphere. Thus, the difficult and sometimes hazardous process of frequent instillation of artificial tears may be avoided. The lens acts in this instance to substitute, in part, for the functioning of the diseased lacrimal glands and would be considered a prosthetic device in the rare case when it is used in the treatment of dry eye.
Aphakic Contact Lenses for Infants with Aphakia
Lambert and colleagues (2014) conducted the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study, a multi-center, randomized clinical trial (RCT), comparing the visual outcomes of patients optically corrected with contact lenses versus intraocular lens (IOL) implantation following unilateral cataract surgery in early infancy. This RCT consisted of 114 infants with unilateral congenital cataracts with 5 years of follow-up and visual acuity assessment at 4.5 years of age. The median logMAR visual acuity was not significantly different between the treated eyes in the 2 treatment groups (both, 0.90 (20/159); p=0.54). About 50% of treated eyes in both groups had visual acuity ≤20/200. Significantly more patients in the IOL group had at least 1 adverse event after cataract surgery (contact lens, 56%; IOL, 81%; p=.016). The most common adverse events in the IOL group included lens reproliferation into the visual axis, pupillary membranes and corectopia. Glaucoma/glaucoma suspect occurred in 35% of treated eyes in the contact lens group vs. 28% of eyes in the IOL group (p=.55). Since the initial cataract surgery, significantly more patients in the IOL group have had at least 1 additional intraocular surgery (contact lens, 21%; IOL, 72%; p<.0001). No significant difference was observed between the medial visual acuity of operated eyes in children who underwent primary IOL implantation and those left aphakic. However, the IOL group had significantly more adverse events and additional intraoperative procedures. The investigators recommended leaving the eye aphakic and focusing the eye with a contact lens when operating on an infant with a unilateral cataract < 7 months of age. Furthermore, primary IOL implantation should be reserved for infants the surgeon believes that the burden of cost and handling of a contact lens may result in significant periods of uncorrected aphakia.
VanderVeen and colleagues (2021) reported outcomes of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study (IATS), a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. The investigators evaluated visual outcomes, refractive outcomes, and adverse events at age 10 1/2 years. Eyes that remained aphakic eyes were compared to eyes randomized to primary IOL placement. Fifty-five out of fifty-seven patients randomized to aphakia with contact lens correction were seen for the 10 ½ year study visit; 24/55 eyes (44%) had secondary IOL surgery. Median age at IOL surgery was 5.4 years (range 1.7 to 10.3 years). Mean absolute prediction error was 1.0 ± 0.7D. At age 10 ½ years, the median log MAR VA was 0.9 (range 0.2 to 1.7), similar to VA in the 31 eyes still aphakic (0.8, range 0.1 to 2.9); the number of eyes with stable or improved VA scores between the 4 ½ and 10 ½ year study visits was also similar (78% secondary IOL eyes, 84% aphakic eyes). For eyes undergoing IOL implantation after the 4.5 year study visit (n=22), the mean refraction at age 10 ½ years was −3.2 ±2.7D (range −9.9D to 1.1D), compared to −5.5 ±6.6 D (n=53, range −26.5 to 3.0D) in eyes with primary IOL (p=0.03). The investigators concluded that delayed IOL implantation provides a more predictable refractive outcome at age 10 1/2 years, though the range of refractive error is still large.
Contact Lenses for Myopia Management
Acuvue Abiliti Overnight Therapeutic Lenses
Acuvue Abiliti Overnight Therapeutic Lenses (Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc) were U.S. FDA-approved in May 2021 for the management of nearsightedness (myopia) in non-diseased eyes when prescribed and managed by a qualified eye professional. The lenses are indicated for overnight wear for the temporary reduction of myopia up to 4.00 diopters (D) with eyes having astigmatism up to 1.50 D, and subject to the eye care professional’s myopia management plan, may eliminate the need to wear contact lenses or glasses throughout the waking hours after lenses are removed. The lenses are manufactured from Menicon Z (tisilfocon A) (Johnson & Johnson, 2021a).
Acuvue Abiliti Overnight are orthokeratology (ortho-k) contact lenses that are specifically designed and fitted to match a patient’s eye based on its unique corneal shape to temporarily reshape the cornea during sleep with the goal of correcting myopia during the day without correction. The lenses produce a temporary reduction of myopia by changing the shape (flattening) of the cornea. Flattening the cornea reduces the focusing power of the eye, and if the amount of corneal flattening is properly controlled, it is possible to bring the eye into correct focus and completely compensate for myopia. Thus, these lenses are designed to purposely flatten the shape of the cornea by applying slight pressure to the center of the cornea when the patient is asleep. After the lens is removed, the cornea retains its altered shape for all or part of the remainder of the day. The lenses are to be worn overnight with removal during the following day. The lenses must be worn at night on a regular schedule to maintain the orthokeratology effect, or the myopia will revert to the pre-treatment level (Johnson & Johnson, 2021a, 2021b).
Acuvue Abiliti Overnight lenses are optimized by the use of corneal topography, refractive error and other measurements connected to an experiential fitting software, FitAbiliti. The FitAbiliti software guides the eye care professional through the fitting process and recommends a lens. Abiliti Overnight lenses will be available in two different contact lens designs: Acuvue Abiliti Overnight Therapeutic Lenses for Myopia Management, and Acuvue Abiliti Overnight Therapeutic Lenses for Myopia Management for Astigmatism (Johnson & Johnson, 2021b).
FDA approval was based on a study that evaluated a total of 300 eyes (150 patients) with 274 eyes (137 patients) completing a minimum of 12 months of contact lens wear. Data on 252 eyes were analyzed after 12 months of wear. A total of 251 eyes showed some reduction in myopic refractive error. The average reduction was -2.48 diopters with a range from -0.25 to -4.00 diopters. The amount of myopia reduction varied between patients and could not be predicted prior to treatment. The Acuvue Abiliti Overnight provided a temporary full reduction in some patients with up to -4.00 diopters of myopia. A total of 185 (73%) eyes achieved a visual acuity of 20/20 or better and 242 (96%) eyes achieved 20/40 or better. For the 252 eyes analyzed after 12 months of wear, 55% had no change in or improved best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), while 38% had a loss of 1 line in BSCVA compared to baseline. Four eyes (2 patients) showed a constant reduction of greater than or equal to 2 lines of BSCVA from initial visit to 12-month visit. Reasons of the vision loss were not accurately determined in these cases; however, no significant ocular abnormalities were observed in these eyes at the time of study exit. Of the 252 eyes with initial cylinder power ranging from 0 to 1.50 D, changes in astigmatism after 12 months of wear found decrease from 0.25 to 0.50 D on 85 eyes (34%); decrease from 0.75 to 1.00 D on 71 (28%) of eyes; and decrease greater than or equal to 1.25 D on 14 (6%) of eyes. No astigmatism change was found in 81 (32%) of eyes (Johnson & Johnson, 2021a).
Labeled contraindications include the following:
Per the label, it is not expected that the lenses will provide a risk that is greater than other overnight wear rigid gas permeable contact lenses. The most common side effects which occur in general rigid contact lens wearers are corneal edema and corneal staining. It is anticipated that these two side effects can also occur in some wearers of Acuvue Abiliti Overnight. Other side effects, which may occur, include pain, redness, tearing, irritation, discharge, or abrasion of the eye. When overnight orthokeratology lenses dislocate during sleep, transient distorted vision may occur the following morning after removal of the lenses. This distortion may not be corrected with spectacle lenses. The duration of the distorted vision would rarely be greater than the duration of the daily visual improvement normally achieved with the lenses (Johnson & Johnson, 2021a).
MiSight 1 Day Soft Contact Lenses
MiSight 1 Day soft contact lenses for daily wear (Cooper Vision, Inc.) were FDA-approved in 2019 for the correction of myopic ametropia and for slowing the progression of myopia in children with non-diseased eyes, who at the initiation of treatment are 8 to 12 years of age and have a refraction of -0.75 to -4.00 diopters (spherical equivalent) with ≤ 0.75 diopters of astigmatism. The MiSight soft contact lenses are meant to be worn daily to correct nearsightedness and slow the progression of myopia in children with healthy eyes. When placed on the eye, one part of the MiSight contact lens corrects the refractive error to improve distance vision in nearsighted eyes, similar to a standard corrective lens. In addition, concentric peripheral rings in the lens focus part of the light in front of the retina (the back of the eye). This is believed to reduce the stimulus causing the progression of myopia. MiSight contact lenses are made from a material containing 60% water and 40% omafilcon A. They are intended for single use, are disposable, and should be discarded at the end of each day, not worn overnight (FDA, 2019).
FDA approval was based on data obtained from a prospective clinical trial at four clinical sites and real-world evidence. The safety and effectiveness of MiSight was studied in a three-year randomized, controlled clinical trial by Chamberlain et al (2019) which showed that for the full three-year period, the progression in myopia of those wearing MiSight lenses was less than those wearing conventional soft contact lenses. In addition, subjects who used MiSight had less change in the axial length of the eyeball at each annual checkup. Over the course of the trial, there were no serious ocular adverse events in either arm of the study. Additionally, to estimate the rate of vision-threatening corneal infections (i.e., corneal ulcers) among children and adolescents who wear soft contact lenses daily, the FDA reviewed real world data from a retrospective analysis of medical records of 782 children ages 8 to 12 years old from seven community eye care clinics. The results showed a rate comparable to the rate of ulcer cases among adults who wear contact lenses daily (FDA, 2019).
Chamberlain et al (2019) conducted a 3-year parallel-group, randomized, controlled, double-masked clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the MiSight daily disposable soft contact lens in slowing the progression of juvenile-onset myopia. One-hundred-forty-four (144) myopic children (spherical equivalent refraction, -0.75 to -4.00 D; astigmatism, <1.00 D) aged 8 to 12 years with no prior contact lens experience were enrolled in this multicenter study. Subjects in each group were matched for age, sex, and ethnicity and were randomized to either a MiSight 1-day contact lens (test) or Proclear 1-day (control; omafilcon A) and worn on a daily disposable basis. Primary outcome measures were the change in cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SERE) and axial length. Of the subjects enrolled, 75.5% (109/144) completed the clinical trial (53 test, 56 control). Unadjusted change in spherical equivalent refraction was -0.73 D (59%) less in the test group than in the control group (p < .001). Mean change in axial length was 0.32 mm (52%) less in the test group than in the control group (p < .001). Changes in SERE and axial length were highly correlated (r = -0.90, p < .001). Over the course of the study, there were no cases of serious ocular adverse events reported. Four asymptomatic corneal infiltrative (one test, three control) events were observed at scheduled study visits. The authors concluded that the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the MiSight daily disposable soft contact lens in slowing change in spherical equivalent refraction and axial length.
Chalmers et al (2021) conducted a retrospective cohort review (ReCSS study) to estimate a rate of microbial keratitis and other adverse events in conventional daily wear soft contact lenses (SCL) in children initially fit between the ages of 8-12 years of age, ascertaining the safety of SCL wear in children in real-world clinical practice settings. The study reviewed clinical charts from 963 children: 782 patients in 7 US eye care clinics and 181 subjects from 2 international randomized clinical trials. Subjects were first fitted while 8 to 12 years old with various SCL designs, prescriptions and replacement schedules, and observed through to age 16. Clinical records from visits with potential adverse events (AEs) were electronically scanned and reviewed to consensus by an Adjudication Panel. The study encompassed 2713 years‐of‐wear and 4611 contact lens visits. The cohort was 46% male, 60% were first fitted with daily disposable SCLs, the average age at first fitting was 10.5 years old, with a mean of 2.8 ± 1.5 years‐of‐wear of follow‐up observed. There were 122 potential ocular AEs observed from 118/963 (12.2%) subjects; the annualized rate of non‐infectious inflammatory AEs was 0.66%/year (95% CI 0.39–1.05) and 0.48%/year (0.25–0.82) for contact lens papillary conjunctivitis. After adjudication, two presumed or probable microbial keratitis (MK) cases were identified, a rate of 7.4/10 000 years‐of‐wear (95% CI 1.8–29.6). Both were in teenage boys and one resulted in a small scar without loss of visual acuity. The authors concluded that this estimated the MK rate and the rate of other inflammatory AEs in a cohort of SCL wearers from 8 through to 16 years of age. Both rates are comparable to established rates among adults wearing SCLs.
Each lens is supplied sterile in a blister containing buffered isotonic saline solution. For best results, it is recommended that the patient wears the lens for a minimum of 10 hours per day for at least 6 days per week. Daily wear lenses are not indicated for overnight wear, and patients should be instructed not to wear lenses while sleeping.
PVR-PROSE Scleral Lens
PVR PROSE Treatment uses prosthetic lenses that are large-diameter gas permeable contact lenses, specially designed to vault over the entire corneal surface and rest on the "white" of the eye. In doing so, PVR PROSE lenses functionally replace the irregular cornea with a perfectly smooth optical surface to correct vision problems caused by keratoconus, Lasik failures, post-surgical complications, and other corneal irregularities. PVR PROSE lenses are designed to vault the corneal surface and rest on the less sensitive surface of the sclera, these lenses often are more comfortable for a person with corneal irregularities, like keratoconus. A special liquid fills the space between the back surface of the lens and the front surface of the cornea. This liquid acts as a buffer and protects the compromised corneal tissue.
Echo Frames/Smart Audio Glasses
Echo Frames are smart audio glasses that provide hands-free access to Alexa. Customers can listen to audio entertainment, control their smart home, stay productive and organized, and communicate hands-free. Echo Frames launched in 2019, are available in the U.S. only, and have over 5,300 customer reviews with a 4.2 out of 5-star rating. Echo Frames are lightweight, IPX4 splash-resistant for water and sweat and are available in prescription ready frames, polarized sunglass lenses with UV400 protection or blue light filtering lenses. However, there is a lack of evidence that the use of Echo Frames / smart audio glasses would improve health outcomes.
Mulfari et al (2017) noted that in the field of deep learning, this study presented the design of a wearable computer vision system for visually impaired users. The Assistive Technology solution exploits a powerful single-board computer and smart glasses with a camera in order to allow its user to examine objects within his/her surrounding environment, while it employs Google TensorFlow machine learning framework in order to real time classify the acquired stills. The authors concluded that the proposed aid could enhance the awareness of the explored environment and it interacted with its user by means of audio messages.
Caria et al (2019) stated that the growing interest in augmented reality (AR) systems is becoming increasingly evident in all production sectors. However, to the authors' knowledge, a literature gap has been found with regard to the application of smart glasses for AR in the agriculture and livestock sector. In fact, this technology allows farmers to manage animal husbandry in line with precision agriculture principles. These researchers examined the performances of an AR head-wearable device as a valuable and integrative tool in precision livestock farming. In this study, the GlassUp F4 Smart Glasses (F4SG) for AR were examined. Laboratory and farm tests were carried out to examine the implementation of this new technology in livestock farms. The results highlighted several advantages of F4SG applications in farm activities. The clear and fast readability of the information related to a single issue, combined with the large number of readings that SG performed, allowed F4SG adoption even in large farms. Furthermore, the 7 hours of battery life and the good quality of audio-video features highlighted their valuable attitude in remote assistance, supporting farmers on the field. Nevertheless, other studies are needed to provide more findings for future development of software applications specifically designed for agricultural purposes.
Yoon et al (2021) noted that observation of medical trainees' care performance by experts can be extremely helpful for ensuring safety and providing quality care. The advanced technology of smart glasses enables health professionals to video stream their operations to remote supporters for collaboration and cooperation. This study monitored the clinical situation by using smart glasses for remote co-operative training via video streaming and clinical decision-making via simulation based on a scenario of emergency nursing care for patients with arrhythmia. The clinical operations of bedside trainees, who is Google Glass Enterprise Edition 2 (Glass EE2) wearers, were live streamed via their Google Glasses, which were viewed at a remote site by remote supporters via a desktop computer. Data were obtained from 31 nursing students using 8 essay questions regarding their experience as desktop-side remote supporters. Most of the participants reported feeling uneasy regarding identifying clinical situations (84 %), patients' condition (72 %), and trainees' performance (69 %). The current system demonstrated sufficient performance with a satisfactory level of image quality and auditory communication, while network and connectivity were areas that require further improvement. The reported barriers to identifying situations on the remote desktop were predominantly a narrow field of view and motion blur in videos captured by Glass EE2s; and using the customized mirror mode. The authors concluded that the current commercial Glass EE2 could facilitate enriched communication between remotely located supporters and trainees by sharing live videos and audio during clinical operations. Moreover, these researchers stated that further improvement of hardware and software user interfaces are needed to ensure better applicability of smart glasses and video streaming functions to clinical practice settings.
Scope of Policy
This Clinical Policy Bulletin addresses contact lenses and eyeglasses.
Medical Necessity
Note: Many Aetna medical plans exclude coverage of contact lenses or eyeglasses. Under medical plans with this exclusion, contact lenses are only covered under medical plans for a narrow set of therapeutic indications, as outlined below. Additional coverage of contact lenses and eyeglasses may be provided under the member's vision care plan, if any. Please check benefit plan descriptions for details.
Replacement Eyeglasses Under Plans With a Pediatric Vision Benefit
Some plans include a pediatric vision benefit. Please check benefit plan descriptions. Under these plans, replacement lenses are considered medically necessary for children and adolescents when one or more of the following criteria are met:
Prosthetic Contact Lenses and Eyeglasses for Aphakia
Medicare plans and HMO plans (HMO, QPOS)
For Aetna Medicare plans and Aetna HMO plans, Aetna follows Medicare's rules for prosthetic lenses.
For Aetna Medicare members and HMO members, Aetna considers external lenses (contacts or spectacles) and intraocular lenses medically necessary after cataract surgery. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) defines both types of lenses as “prostheses” replacing the lens of the eye. This includes post-surgical external lenses that are customarily used during convalescence from cataract removal surgery. In addition, an intraocular lens is considered a medically necessary prosthetic for individuals lacking an organic lens because of surgical removal (e.g., cataract surgery) or congenital absence (congenital aphakia).
Note: Aetna covers medically necessary external and internal lenses as prosthetics for aphakic members even if the surgical removal of the member's lens occurred before the member enrolled in Aetna's medical plan.
For Medicare and HMO members, Aetna considers lenses or combinations of lenses medically necessary following cataract surgery to essentially restore the vision provided by the crystalline lens of the eye, including:
For Medicare members and HMO members, Aetna medical plans consider lenses with ultraviolet (UV) protection medically necessary in lieu of regular (untinted) lenses for aphakia. UV coating is considered medically necessary when applied to a glass lens material.
Anti-reflective coating, tints, or oversize lenses are not generally considered medically necessary; the medical necessity of such features must be documented by the treating physician.
Aetna considers cataract sunglasses (i.e., tinted lenses, including photochromatic lenses (lenses in which the tint changes in response to light)) that are prescribed in addition to regular (untinted) lenses for aphakia medically necessary because the sunglasses duplicate the restoration of vision function performed by the regular lenses.
Aetna considers the following features not medically necessary:
Lenses made of polycarbonate or other impact-resistant materials (e.g., Trivex) are considered medically necessary for members with functional vision in only one eye. Use of polycarbonate or similar material or high index glass or plastic for indications such as light weight or thinness is considered not medically necessary.
Standard eyeglass frames are considered medically necessary for persons who meet criteria for refractive lenses. Deluxe frames are considered convenience items.
Under Medicare and HMO plans, Aetna considers eyewear a medically necessary prosthetic for aphakic members who have not had an intraocular lens replacement. Additionally, Aetna considers aphakic contact lenses medically necessary under Medicare and HMO plans as prosthetics for infants with aphakia after congenital cataract surgery and who have not had intraocular lens implantation. Aphakic members lack an internal lens where their contact lenses or eyeglasses are considered to be prosthetics. For Medicare and HMO plans, Aetna medical plans consider medically necessary the first pair of glasses or aphakia contact lenses after cataract surgery and an additional pair of lens(es) each time the member's prescription changes. Requests for replacement of lost or broken glasses or lenses will be reviewed on an individual basis. (There is a CMS requirement for consideration of replacement of lost or broken contact lenses or eyeglasses for Medicare members who have had cataract surgery.)
Note: For Medicare and HMO members who have had cataract surgery with insertion of an intraocular lens (IOL), Aetna Medicare and HMO plans, by administration, will cover no more than 1 pair of eyeglasses or contact lenses after each cataract surgery. Replacements of conventional eyeglasses or contact lenses are not covered under these medical plans. The member may have additional eyewear coverage through a vision care rider.
Traditional (non-HMO) plans (Indemnity, PPO and MC POS plans)
While contact lenses and eyeglasses are rarely used in place of intraocular lenses in aphakia, contact lenses and eyeglasses are considered medically necessary under traditional medical plans as a prosthetic device following cataract surgery in lieu of intraocular lenses. Additionally, Aetna considers aphakic contact lenses medically necessary under traditional plans as prosthetics for infants with aphakia after congenital cataract surgery and who have not had intraocular lens implantation. Aphakic members lack an internal lens where their contact lenses or eyeglasses are considered to be prosthetics. For traditional plans, Aetna medical plans consider medically necessary the first pair of glasses or aphakia contact lenses after cataract surgery and an additional pair of lens(es) each time the member's prescription changes.
Note: Most Aetna plans exclude coverage of contact lenses and spectacles. Under these plans, eyeglasses and contact lenses in non-aphakic members, including those who have had intraocular lenses implanted after cataract surgery, are not covered under medical plans. Contact lenses and eyeglasses may be covered under the member's vision care plan.
Therapeutic Hydrophilic Contact Lenses (Corneal Bandage)
Therapeutic soft (hydrophilic) contact lenses or gas-permeable fluid ventilated scleral lenses (e.g., Boston Scleral Lens and PVR PROSE Scleral Lens) are considered medically necessary prosthetics under medical plans where used as moist corneal bandages for the treatment of severe ocular surface diseases, including
: Liquid bandage scleral lenses are covered under plans that exclude coverage of contact lenses, as these lenses are not primarily for correction of refractive errors.
Note: For scleral lenses for masking irregular astigmatism, see section below.
Replacement lenses are considered medically necessary under medical plans if required because of a change in the patient's physical condition (not including refractive changes).
Note: Charges to replace contact lenses that are lost, damaged, or required solely due to refractive changes are not covered under medical plans.
Scleral Shell Contact Lenses
Scleral shell contact lenses are considered medically necessary under medical plans for the following indications:
Replacement lenses are considered medically necessary under medical plans if required because of a change in the member's physical condition (not including refractive changes).
Note: Charges to replace contact lenses that are lost, damaged, or required solely due to refractive changes are not covered under medical plans.
Note: Scleral shell lenses are covered under plans that exclude coverage of contact lenses, as scleral shell lenses are not primarily for correction of refractive errors.
Contact Lenses and Eyeglasses for Accidental Injury
An initial pair of contact lenses or eyeglasses is considered medically necessary under medical plans when they are prescribed by a physician to correct a change in vision directly resulting from an accidental bodily injury.
Note: Charges to replace such contact lenses or eyeglasses are not covered under medical plans.
Contact Lenses for Masking Irregular Astigmatism Associated with Keratoconus and Other Corneal Disorders
Aetna considers services that are part of an evaluation of keratoconus or other corneal disorders associated with irregular astigmatism (e.g., keratoglobus, pellucid corneal degeneration, Terrien's marginal degeneration, post-LASIK ectasia, corneal scarring) medically necessary. This includes the general examination, advanced corneal topographic modeling, and fitting of contact lenses or scleral lenses.
Note: Most Aetna medical benefit plans exclude coverage of contact lenses and other vision aids. Please check benefit plan descriptions for details. These benefit plans do not cover contact lenses or scleral lenses for correcting astigmatism associated with keratoconus or other corneal disorders under medical plans that exclude coverage of contact lenses and eyeglasses. This includes corneal contact lenses and scleral lenses that may be prescribed for masking irregular astigmatism associated with corneal ectasia (e.g., keratoconus, keratoglobus, pellucid corneal degeneration, Terriens marginal degeneration, post-LASIK ectasia), post-operative astigmatism (e.g., following refractive surgery or corneal transplant), corneal scarring (e.g., from trauma, infection, or Hydrops), and anterior corneal dystrophies (e.g. Meesman's, Cogan's). Contact lenses and scleral lenses provided to members with keratoconus and other corneal disorders associated with irregular astigmatism are covered under the provisions of the member's vision care plan only.
Contact Lenses for Myopia Management
Aetna considers the following contact lenses for myopia management medically necessary when criteria are met. Note: Aetna standard medical benefit plans exclude coverage of vision aids, contact lenses and eyeglasses, and surgery to correct refractive errors; the following would be excluded from coverage under those plans. Please check benefit plan descriptions for details.
Acuvue Abiliti Overnight Therapeutic Lenses
For correction of myopia in persons with myopia of up to 4 diopters (D) and no more than 1.5 D of astigmatism.
MiSight 1 Day Soft Contact Lenses
For correction of myopic ametropia and for slowing the progression of myopia in children with non-diseased eyes, who at the initiation of treatment, are 8 to 12 years of age and have a refraction of -0.75 to -4.00 D (spherical equivalent) with less than or equal to 0.75 D of astigmatism.
Echo Frames/Smart Audio Glasses
: Some HMO plans cover only an initial prosthetic, and exclude coverage of replacements of prosthetics regardless of medical necessity. Under these plans, only an initial set of glasses or contact lenses are covered under the medical plan. Please check benefit plan descriptions for details.
Experimental and Investigational
The following procedures are considered experimental and investigational because the effectiveness of these approaches has not been established:
Corneal bandages for all other indications (except for the ones listed above). MiSight 1 Day Soft Contact Lenses for all other indications (except for the ones listed above) Orthokeratology lenses for correction of myopia and for all other indications (except forPolicy Limitations and Exclusions
Note: Many Aetna medical plans exclude coverage of contact lenses or eyeglasses. Under medical plans with this exclusion, contact lenses are only covered under medical plans for a narrow set of therapeutic indications, as outlined below. Additional coverage of contact lenses and eyeglasses may be provided under the member's vision care plan, if any. Please check benefit plan descriptions for details.
Walk through this policy with us
Review how this policy can be converted into cited criteria, prior authorization checks, and operational automation.