Documentation of patient reason(s) for not prescribing a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator
HCPCS code
Name of the Procedure:
HCPCS G9697 - Documentation of Patient Reason(s) for Not Prescribing a Long-Acting Inhaled Bronchodilator
Summary
This procedure involves documenting the specific reasons why a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator was not prescribed to a patient. This typically includes patient-specific considerations such as preferences, clinical contraindications, or situations where the inhaler is not suitable.
Purpose
The purpose of this documentation is to provide a clear rationale for not prescribing a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator, ensuring accurate medical records and aiding in the continuity of care. It addresses:
- Ensuring patient safety
- Honoring patient preferences
- Justifying clinical decisions
Indications
This procedure is indicated when:
- A patient is unable or unwilling to use a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator due to specific reasons.
- Clinical contraindications exist that make the use of such medications unsafe for the patient.
- Alternative treatment options are more suitable for the patient's condition.
Patient criteria include:
- Documented allergies or adverse reactions to the bronchodilator
- Patient refusal or non-compliance concerns
- Comorbid conditions that contraindicate the use of bronchodilators
Preparation
Patients should:
- Discuss their medical history and medication preferences with their healthcare provider.
- Undergo necessary assessments to determine the appropriateness of a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator.
Procedure Description
- Initial Assessment: Conduct a thorough patient history and clinical assessment.
- Discussion: Engage in a detailed discussion with the patient regarding the benefits and risks of using a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator.
- Documentation: Clearly document the patient's reason(s) for not prescribing the medication, including any contraindications, preferences, or other relevant factors.
- Alternative Planning: Explore and document alternative treatment options discussed with the patient.
Tools/Equipment:
- Electronic Health Record (EHR) system for documentation
- Standard clinical assessment tools
Duration
The documentation process typically takes 10-15 minutes, depending on the complexity of the case.
Setting
The procedure is usually performed in:
- Outpatient clinic
- Physician's office
- Hospital setting during a patient visit
Personnel
- Primary Care Physician
- Pulmonologist
- Nurse Practitioner or Physician Assistant
- Medical Assistants
Risks and Complications
Minimal risks are associated with the documentation procedure itself. The primary risks involve:
- Incomplete or erroneous documentation leading to suboptimal patient care
- Legal or compliance issues if documentation is not thorough
Benefits
The primary benefit is ensuring that patient care decisions are well-documented and justified, leading to improved patient safety and continuity of care. Benefits are often immediate as they aid in clinical decision-making and future care planning.
Recovery
No recovery period is needed as this is a documentation procedure.
Alternatives
- Directly prescribing a different class of medication
- Referring to a specialist for further evaluation and alternative treatment options
Pros and Cons:
- Pros: Better alignment with patient preferences and safety.
- Cons: May require more time to find an appropriate alternative treatment.
Patient Experience
During the discussion and documentation:
- The patient might experience relief knowing their preferences are considered.
- Patients should feel comfortable discussing any concerns and know that these are taken seriously.
Pain management and comfort measures are not applicable as this is a non-invasive documentation procedure.