Sunflower Health Plan Gastric Electrical Stimulation (PDF) Form
Please answer all questions to determine coverage (0 of 5)
Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) has been used as compassionate care in patients who are
proven refractory to conventional treatment for gastroparesis.1 It can be used as an alternative to
surgery to reduce symptoms of gastroparesis.2 The GES device includes a pair of leads that are
placed in the muscularis propria of greater curvature of the stomach about ten cm proximal to the
pylorus.3 The leads are connected to a pulse generator that is typically placed subcutaneously in
the right or left upper quadrants of the abdomen, and an external programming device controls
the gastric stimulation parameters of the GES device.3 This stimulation has not shown a
significant improvement in gastric emptying but has proven to be beneficial in those who have
nausea and vomiting as primary symptoms.4,5
Policy/Criteria
I. It is the policy of health plans affiliated with Centene Corporation® that gastric electrical
stimulation (GES) is medically necessary for diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis when all
the following criteria are met:
A. Diagnosis of idiopathic gastroparesis confirmed by gastric emptying scintigraphy;
B. Severe nausea and vomiting occurring at least once daily on most days of the week for
the duration of more than one year;
C. Documented intolerance or failure of a trial of antiemetic, dietary modifications, and
prokinetic drug therapy;
D. Not currently pregnant;
E. Technology is provided in accordance with the Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE)
specifications of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Note:
• Current recommended combination prokinetic therapy includes metoclopramide and
erythromycin, and centrally acting antidepressants used as symptom modulators.
• A humanitarian device exemption (HDE) is granted by the FDA. A humanitarian use
device (HUD) is a device that is intended to benefit patients in the treatment or
diagnosis of a disease or condition that affects fewer than 8,000 individuals in the
United States annually. A HUD may only be used in facilities that have established a
local institutional review board to supervise clinical testing of devices and after an
independent review board has approved the use of the device to treat or diagnose the
specific disease.14
II. It is the policy of health plans affiliated with Centene Corporation that GES is not medically
necessary for the reduction of pain, fullness, bloating, or acid reflux symptoms as there is no
evidence to support efficacy of such therapy.
Page 1 of 6
CLINICAL POLICY
Gastric Electrical Stimulation
III. It is the policy of health plans affiliated with Centene Corporation that current evidence in
peer-reviewed literature does not support the use of GES for any other indications, including,
but not limited to the treatment of obesity.
Background
Gastric Electrical Stimulation (GES) for Gastroparesis
Gastroparesis is a disorder in which there is delayed gastric emptying following ingestion of food
in the absence of mechanical obstruction due to abnormal or absent motility of the stomach.2,6,7
The stomach is unable to contract normally and cannot crush food or propel food into the small
intestine properly.2,8
There are numerous conditions associated with gastroparesis, but the majority of gastroparesis
cases are either idiopathic or associated with diabetes.6,8 The main symptoms of gastroparesis
include nausea, vomiting, early satiety, bloating, and abdominal discomfort.6,8 Nausea and
vomiting may be so severe that it causes weight loss, dehydration, electrolyte disturbances, and
malnutrition.3
It is theorized that GES works in the following ways:
1. Activation of the central mechanisms for nausea and vomiting control related to afferent
nerves being stimulated by the constant high frequency current in the stomach wall;
2. Enhanced relaxation of the fundus of the stomach by the electrical current, thus providing
better accommodation and decreased sensitivity to distention;
3. Augmentation of the amplitude of gastric slow wave after eating;
4. Increase in cholinergic function and decreased sympathetic functions;
5. Small and unpredictable improvements in gastric emptying.
Multiple studies on GES for gastroparesis have shown an improvement in quality of life scores,
even though on average, gastric emptying did not change. Quality of life scores improved along
with weight gain, and there was a reduction in hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) and a decrease in
hospitalizations.5 Nausea and vomiting also improved for at least one year after surgery.4,5,9
Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Obesity
GES is currently not supported by peer-reviewed literature as a treatment for obesity. Cha et al10
reviewed current approaches to evaluate the effect of GES on obesity and included 31 studies in
their systematic review. Most of the studies showed weight loss during the first 12 months of
treatment, but only a few studies performed follow-up past one year. Some of the evaluated GES
treatments also showed positive effects in lowering HbA1c and blood pressure. The review
concluded that GES is promising for the treatment of obesity, but stronger studies with longer
follow-up are needed to determine long-term effects.10
Lebovitz11 reviewed the evidence on three different methods of GES, including the Transcend®
Implantable Gastric Stimulator, the Maestro™ vagal blockade device, and the DIAMOND™
gastric electrical stimulatory device. Two randomized controlled trials failed to show a
significant benefit in excess weight loss with the Transcend device. The other evaluated GES
device, the DIAMOND, has been assessed in clinical trials with obese patients with type II
diabetes. Findings were positive and included reduced HbA1c and weight loss, but these results
Page 2 of 6
CLINICAL POLICY
Gastric Electrical Stimulation
varied among patients included in the treatment and seemed to be influenced by baseline HbA1c
levels and triglyceride levels. Further research is needed to determine long-term effects and
appropriate patient selection criteria to ensure the best outcomes.11
Coding Implications
This clinical policy references Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®). CPT® is a registered
trademark of the American Medical Association. All CPT codes and descriptions are copyrighted
2020, American Medical Association. All rights reserved. CPT codes and CPT descriptions are
from the current manuals and those included herein are not intended to be all-inclusive and are
for informational purposes only. They are current at time of review of this policy. Inclusion or
exclusion of any codes does not guarantee coverage. Providers should reference the most up-to-
date sources of professional coding guidance prior to the submission of claims for
reimbursement of covered services.
CPT®
Codes
43647
43648
43881
43882
64590
64595
95980
95981
95982
HCPCS
Codes
C1767
C1778
L8679
L8680
Laparoscopy, surgical; implantation or replacement of gastric neurostimulator
electrodes, antrum
Laparoscopy, surgical; revision or removal of gastric neurostimulator electrodes,
antrum
Implantation or replacement of gastric neurostimulator electrodes, antrum, open
Revision or removal of gastric neurostimulator electrodes, antrum, open
Insertion or replacement of peripheral or gastric neurostimulator pulse generator or
receiver, direct or inductive coupling
Revision or removal of peripheral or gastric neurostimulator pulse generator or
receiver
Electronic analysis of implanted neurostimulator pulse generator system (eg, rate,
pulse amplitude and duration, configuration of wave form, battery status, electrode
selectability, output modulation, cycling, impedance, and patient measurements)
gastric neurostimulator pulse generator/transmitter, intraoperative, with programming
Electronic analysis of implanted neurostimulator pulse generator system (eg, rate,
pulse amplitude and duration, configuration of wave form, battery status, electrode
selectability, output modulation, cycling, impedance and patient measurements)
gastric neurostimulator pulse generator/transmitter; subsequent, without
reprogramming
Electronic analysis of implanted neurostimulator pulse generator system (eg, rate,
pulse amplitude and duration, configuration of wave form, battery status, electrode
selectability, output modulation, cycling, impedance and patient measurements)
gastric neurostimulator pulse generator/transmitter; subsequent, with reprogramming
Generator, neurostimulator (implantable), non-rechargeable
Lead, neurostimulator (implantable)
Implantable neurostimulator, pulse generator, any type
Implantable neurostimulator electrode, each
Page 3 of 6
CLINICAL POLICY
Gastric Electrical Stimulation
HCPCS
Codes
L8688
Implantable neurostimulator pulse generator, dual array, non-rechargeable, includes
extension
Reviews, Revisions, and Approvals
References reviewed and updated. Modified language regarding trial of
antiemetic and prokinetic drug therapy.
Added criteria that gastroparesis should be confirmed by scintigraphy.
Modified criteria in I.B requiring daily vomiting to say that vomiting
should happen at least once daily on most days of the week. References
reviewed and updated. Codes updated.
Added “gastric emptying” to scintigraphy in I.A. for clarification.
Modified III. to state that GES is investigational for all other indications,
including but not limited to the treatment obesity. References and codes
reviewed and updated.
Reference reviewed and updated. Removed contraindications of alcohol
dependency, dialysis, and cancer w/limited life span. Specialist review.
References reviewed and updated. Replaced “members” with
“members/enrollees” in all instances.
Annual review. Updated description with no impact on criteria.
Changed “review date” in the header to “date of last revision” and “date”
in the revision log header to “revision date." References reviewed,
reformatted, and updated. Specialist reviewed.
Annual review. References reviewed and updated. Updated description
and background with no clinical significance.
Annual review. “Dietary modifications” added to I.C. and “FDA
specifications” added as I.E. Updated verbiage in note at the end of
criteria I. and added additional note about humanitarian device
exemptions. ICD-10 code table removed. References reviewed and
updated. External specialist reviewed.
Revision
Date
09/11
Approval
Date
11/11
10/17
10/17
08/18
09/18
08/19
09/19
08/20
09/20
09/21
09/21
02/22
02/22
02/23
02/23