Sunflower Health Plan Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis Pregnancy Loss (PDF) Form
YesNoN/A
YesNoN/A
YesNoN/A
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
CONCERT GENETIC TESTING:
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS (VIA
AMNIOCENTESIS, CVS, OR PUBS)
AND PREGNANCY LOSS
See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal
information.
OVERVIEW
Prenatal diagnostic testing may be used to identify genetic conditions in fetuses at an increased
risk based on prenatal screening or for women who choose to undergo diagnostic testing due to
other risk factors, such as abnormal ultrasound findings, previous pregnancy with aneuploidy,
etc. Prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders is performed on fetal cells derived from
amniotic fluid, and/or percutaneous umbilical blood sampling (PUBS) (cordocentesis) or from
placental cells via chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Genetic testing techniques include
conventional chromosome analysis, chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH),
chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), targeted or Sanger sequencing, and next-generation
sequencing (NGS).
Genetic testing may also be used in an attempt to determine the cause of isolated or recurrent
pregnancy loss, including miscarriages, intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD), and stillbirth. The
evaluation of both recurrent and isolated miscarriages and IUFD or stillbirth may involve genetic
testing of the products of conception (POC) and/or testing of fetal/placental cells from amniotic
fluid, CVS, or PUBS if available. Such testing of POC has typically been carried out through cell
culture and karyotyping of cells in metaphase. However, the analysis of fetal or placental tissue
has been inhibited by the following limitations: the need for fresh tissue, the potential for cell
culture failure, and the potential for maternal cell contamination. Potential benefits of identifying
a genetic abnormality in a miscarriage or IUFD include reducing emotional distress for families,
causes of pregnancy loss, and assisting in
eliminating the need for additional testing to assess for
reproductive decision making for future pregnancies.
1
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
POLICY REFERENCE TABLE
Below is a list of higher volume tests and the associated laboratories for each coverage criteria
section. This list is not all inclusive.
Coding Implications
This clinical policy references Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®). CPT® is a registered
trademark of the American Medical Association. All CPT codes and descriptions are copyrighted
2022, American Medical Association. All rights reserved. CPT codes and CPT descriptions are
from the current manuals and those included herein are not intended to be all-inclusive and are
included for informational purposes only. Codes referenced in this clinical policy are for
informational purposes only. Inclusion or exclusion of any codes does not guarantee coverage.
Providers should reference the most up-to-date sources of professional coding guidance prior to
the submission of claims for reimbursement of covered services.
Coverage Criteria
Coverage Criteria
Sections
Sections
Example Tests (Labs)
Example Tests (Labs)
Common CPT
Common CPT
Codes
Codes
Common ICD
Common ICD
Codes
Codes
Ref
Ref
Chromosomal FISH
Chromosomal FISH
(Aneuploidy) Analysis
(Aneuploidy) Analysis
Aneuploidy Panel by FISH (ARUP
Aneuploidy Panel by FISH (ARUP
Laboratories)
Laboratories)
81265, 88230,
81265, 88230,
88235, 88271,
88235, 88271,
88275, 88291
88275, 88291
Reveal® SNP Microarray - Prenatal
Reveal® SNP Microarray - Prenatal
(Integrated Genetics)
(Integrated Genetics)
81228, 81229,
81228, 81229,
81265, 88235
81265, 88235
Chromosomal
Chromosomal
Microarray Analysis
Microarray Analysis
(CMA) for Prenatal
(CMA) for Prenatal
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Conventional Karyotype
Conventional Karyotype
Analysis for Prenatal
Analysis for Prenatal
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Chromosomal
Chromosomal
Microarray Analysis
Microarray Analysis
Prenatal Whole Genome
Prenatal Whole Genome
Chromosomal Microarray (GeneDx)
Chromosomal Microarray (GeneDx)
Chromosome Analysis, Amniotic
Chromosome Analysis, Amniotic
Fluid (GeneDx)
Fluid (GeneDx)
Chromosome Analysis, Chorionic
Chromosome Analysis, Chorionic
Villus Sample (Quest Diagnostics)
Villus Sample (Quest Diagnostics)
Chromosome Analysis, Amniotic
Chromosome Analysis, Amniotic
Fluid (Quest Diagnostics)
Fluid (Quest Diagnostics)
SNP Microarray-Products of
SNP Microarray-Products of
Conception (POC)/Tissue (Reveal)
Conception (POC)/Tissue (Reveal)
(LabCorp)
(LabCorp)
O26.2, O28,
O26.2, O28,
Q00 through
Q00 through
Q99, Z14.8
Q99, Z14.8
O26.2, O28,
O26.2, O28,
Q00 through
Q00 through
Q99, Z14.8
Q99, Z14.8
3
3
3
3
9
9
88235, 88261,
88235, 88261,
88262, 88263,
88262, 88263,
88264, 88267,
88264, 88267,
88269, 88280,
88269, 88280,
88291
88291
O26.2, O28,
O26.2, O28,
Q00 through
Q00 through
Q99, Z14.8
Q99, Z14.8
81228, 81229,
81228, 81229,
81265, 88235
81265, 88235
O03, Z37
O03, Z37
1, 2,
1, 2,
11
11
2
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
(CMA) for Pregnancy
Loss
Conventional Karyotype
Analysis for Pregnancy
Loss
Chromosomal Micorarray, POC,
ClariSure Oligo-SNP (Quest
Diagnostics)
Chromosome Analysis, POC, Tissue
(Bioreference Labs)
Chromosome Analysis, Products of
Conception (POC) (GeneDx)
PGxome Prenatal Exome Test
(PreventionGenetics)
Exome or Genome
Sequencing for
Pregnancy Loss
Prenatal Diagnosis for
Single-Gene Disorders
88235, 88261,
88262, 88263,
88264, 88267,
88269, 88280,
88291
81415, 81416,
81265, 88235
O03, Z37
1
O03, Z37
13
O26.2, O28,
Z14.8
3, 7
Various Targeted Mutation Analysis 81174, 81177-
81190, 81200,
81202, 81204,
81205, 81209,
81221, 81239,
81242-81244,
81248, 81250-
81260, 81269,
81271, 81274,
81284-81286,
81289, 81290,
81303, 81312,
81330-81332,
81337, 81343,
81344, 81361-
81364, 81400-
81408, 88235,
81265
Prenatal Diagnosis for
Noonan Spectrum
Disorders/RASopathies
Prenatal Noonan Spectrum
Disorders Panel (GeneDx)
Prenatal Noonan Syndrome
(LabCorp)
Prenatal Diagnosis for
Skeletal Dysplasias
Prenatal Skeletal Dysplasia Panel
(GeneDx)
Skeletal Dysplasia Core NGS Panel
(Connective Tissue Gene Tests)
81404, 81405,
81406, 81407,
81479, 81442,
81265, 88235
81404, 81405,
81408, 81479,
81265, 88235
O28.3,
O35.8XX0
8, 10
O35.8XX0,
O28.3
4
Prenatal Diagnosis via
Exome Sequencing
XomeDx Prenatal-Comprehensive
(GeneDx)
81415, 81416,
81265, 88235
O35.8XX0,
O28.3
5, 6
3
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
Prenatal Exome Sequencing
Prenatal Exome Sequencing
(Greenwood Genetic Center)
(Greenwood Genetic Center)
Prenatal Diagnosis via
Prenatal Diagnosis via
Genome Sequencing
Genome Sequencing
Prenatal Whole Genome Sequencing 81425, 81426,
Prenatal Whole Genome Sequencing 81425, 81426,
81427, 88235,
81427, 88235,
81265, 0335U,
81265, 0335U,
0336U
0336U
O35.8XX0,
O35.8XX0,
O28.3
O28.3
2, 12
2, 12
OTHER RELATED POLICIES
This policy document provides coverage criteria for prenatal or pregnancy loss diagnostic testing,
and does not address the use of conventional chromosome analysis, CMA, or FISH for
preimplantation genetic testing or the evaluation of suspected chromosome abnormalities in the
postnatal period. Please refer to:
●
●
●
●
●
Genetic Testing: Noninvasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for coverage criteria related to
prenatal cell-free DNA screening tests.
Genetic Testing: Prenatal and Preconception Carrier Screening for coverage criteria
related to carrier screening for genetic disorders.
Genetic Testing: Preimplantation Genetic Testing for coverage criteria related to genetic
testing of embryos prior to in vitro fertilization.
Genetic Testing: Multisystem Inherited Disorders, Intellectual Disability and
Developmental Delay for coverage criteria related to suspected chromosome abnormalities
in the postnatal period.
Genetic Testing: General Approach to Genetic Testing for coverage criteria related to
prenatal diagnostic or pregnancy loss genetic testing that is not specifically discussed in this
or other non-general policies.
CRITERIA
It is the policy of health plans affiliated with Centene Corporation® that the specific genetic
testing noted below is medically necessary when meeting the related criteria:
NOTE: This policy does not address the use of conventional chromosome analysis, CMA, and FISH for
preimplantation genetic testing or the evaluation of suspected chromosome abnormalities in the postnatal period.
4
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
CHROMOSOMAL FISH (ANEUPLOIDY) ANALYSIS
I. Chromosomal FISH for aneuploidy analysis (81265, 88230, 88235, 88271, 88275,
88291) for prenatal diagnosis via amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS may be considered
medically necessary when:
A. The member/enrollee meets any of the following:
1. A fetus with one or more major structural abnormalities (see definitions) on
ultrasound, OR
2. Advanced maternal age (age greater than or equal to 35 years at delivery),
OR
3. An abnormal prenatal screening test (e.g., high risk non-invasive prenatal
screening, abnormal first trimester or quadruple screen, or antenatal soft
markers on ultrasound), OR
4. A parental carrier of a chromosome rearrangement or abnormality, OR
5. Prior pregnancy with a chromosome abnormality, AND
B. The test has been ordered by and the member/enrollee has received genetic
counseling from one of the following (who is not affiliated with the commercial
testing laboratory, if applicable):
1. A board-certified medical geneticist
2. Maternal-fetal medicine specialist/perinatologist
3. A board-certified OBGYN
4. A board-certified genetic counselor
5. An advanced practice practitioner in genetics or maternal-fetal
medicine/perinatology
II. Chromosomal FISH for aneuploidy analysis (81265, 88230, 88235, 88271, 88275,
88291) for prenatal diagnosis via amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS is considered
investigational for all other indications.
back to top
5
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
CHROMOSOMAL MICROARRAY ANALYSIS (CMA) FOR
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
I. Chromosome microarray analysis (81228, 81229, 81265, 88235) for prenatal diagnosis via
amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS may be considered medically necessary when:
A. The member/enrollee has received counseling regarding the benefits and limitations
of prenatal screening and diagnostic testing (including chromosome microarray via
amniocentesis, CVS or PUBS) for fetal chromosome abnormalities.
II. Chromosome microarray analysis (81228, 81229, 81265, 88235) for prenatal diagnosis via
amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS is considered investigational for all other indications.
back to top
CONVENTIONAL KARYOTYPE ANALYSIS FOR PRENATAL
DIAGNOSIS
I. Conventional karyotype analysis (88235, 88261, 88262, 88263, 88264, 88267, 88269,
88280, 88291) for prenatal diagnosis via amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS may be considered
medically necessary when:
A. The member/enrollee has received counseling regarding the benefits and limitations
of prenatal screening and diagnostic testing (including karyotyping via
amniocentesis, CVS or PUBS) for fetal chromosome abnormalities.
II. Conventional karyotype analysis (88235, 88261, 88262, 88263, 88264, 88267, 88269,
88280, 88291) for prenatal diagnosis via amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS is considered
investigational for all other indications.
Note: Current guidelines recommend that chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) be performed as the primary test
for patients undergoing prenatal diagnosis when the fetus has one or more major structural abnormalities identified
by ultrasound examination (see Background and Rationale for more information).
back to top
6
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
CHROMOSOMAL MICROARRAY ANALYSIS (CMA) FOR
PREGNANCY LOSS
I. Chromosomal microarray analysis (81228, 81229, 81265, 88235) on products of conception
(POC) may be considered medically necessary as an alternative to conventional karyotype
analysis when:
A. The member/enrollee meets one of the following:
1. The member/enrollee has a pregnancy loss at 20 weeks of gestation or earlier
and the member/enrollee has a history of recurrent miscarriage (defined as
having two or more failed clinical pregnancies including the current loss),
OR
2. The member/enrollee has a pregnancy loss after 20 weeks of gestation, such
as IUFD or stillbirth, AND
B. The test has been ordered by and the member/enrollee has received genetic
counseling from one of the following (who is not affiliated with the commercial
testing laboratory, if applicable):
1. A board-certified medical geneticist
2. Maternal-fetal medicine specialist/perinatologist
3. A board-certified OBGYN
4. A board-certified genetic counselor
5. An advanced practice practitioner in genetics or maternal-fetal
medicine/perinatology
II. Chromosome microarray analysis (81228, 81229, 81265, 88235) on products of conception
(POC) is considered investigational for all other indications.
back to top
CONVENTIONAL KARYOTYPE ANALYSIS FOR PREGNANCY
LOSS
I. Conventional karyotype analysis (88235, 88261, 88262, 88263, 88264, 88267, 88269,
88280, 88291) on products of conception (POC) may be considered medically necessary
when:
7
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
A. The member/enrollee has a history of recurrent miscarriage (defined as having two
or more failed clinical pregnancies, including the current loss)
II. Conventional karyotype analysis (88235, 88261, 88262, 88263, 88264, 88267, 88269,
88280, 88291) on products of conception (POC) is considered investigational for all other
indications.
back to top
EXOME OR GENOME SEQUENCING FOR PREGNANCY LOSS
I.
Exome or genome sequencing (81265, 81415, 81416, 88235) for pregnancy loss on
products of conception (POC) is considered investigational.
back to top
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS FOR SINGLE GENE DISORDERS
I.
Prenatal diagnosis for single-gene disorders (81174, 81177-81190, 81200, 81202, 81204,
81205, 81209, 81221, 81239, 81242-81244, 81248, 81250-81260, 81269, 81271, 81274,
81284-81286, 81289, 81290, 81303, 81312, 81330-81332, 81337, 81343, 81344, 81361-
81364, 81400-81408, 88235, 81265), via amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS, may be
considered medically necessary when:
A. The member/enrollee meets any of the following:
1. At least one biological parent has a known pathogenic variant for an
autosomal dominant condition, OR
2. Both biological parents are known carriers of an autosomal recessive
condition, OR
3. One biological parent is suspected or known to be a carrier of an X-linked
condition, OR
4. The member/enrollee has a previous affected child with a genetic
condition and germline mosaicism is suspected, AND
B. The natural history of the disease is well-understood, and there is a high
likelihood that the disease has high morbidity, AND
8
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
C. The genetic test has adequate sensitivity and specificity to guide clinical decision
making and residual risk is understood, AND
D. The test has been ordered by and the member/enrollee has received genetic
counseling from one of the following (who is not affiliated with the commercial
testing laboratory, if applicable):
1. A board-certified medical geneticist
2. Maternal-fetal medicine specialist/perinatologist
3. A board-certified OBGYN
4. A board-certified genetic counselor
5. An advanced practice practitioner in genetics or maternal-fetal
medicine/perinatology
II.
III.
IV.
Prenatal diagnosis for single-gene disorders (81174, 81177 through 81190, 81200, 81202,
81204, 81205, 81209, 81221, 81239, 81242 through 81244, 81248, 81250 through 81260,
81269, 81271, 81274, 81284 through 81286, 81289, 81290, 81303, 81312, 81330 through
81332, 81337, 81343, 81344, 81361 through 81364, 81400 through 81408, 88235,
81265), via amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS, for adult onset single-gene disorders
(examples: hereditary cancer syndromes such as BRCA1/2, Huntington disease, etc.) is
considered not medically necessary.
Prenatal diagnosis for single-gene disorders (81174, 81177 through 81190, 81200, 81202,
81204, 81205, 81209, 81221, 81239, 81242 through 81244, 81248, 81250 through 81260,
81269, 81271, 81274, 81284 through 81286, 81289, 81290, 81303, 81312, 81330 through
81332, 81337, 81343, 81344, 81361 through 81364, 81400 through 81408, 88235,
81265), via amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS, is considered investigational for variants of
unknown significance (VUS).
Prenatal diagnosis for single-gene disorders (81174, 81177 through 81190, 81200, 81202,
81204, 81205, 81209, 81221, 81239, 81242 through 81244, 81248, 81250 through 81260,
81269, 81271, 81274, 81284 through 81286, 81289, 81290, 81303, 81312, 81330 through
81332, 81337, 81343, 81344, 81361 through 81364, 81400 through 81408, 88235,
81265), via amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS, is considered investigational for all other
indications.
back to top
9
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS FOR NOONAN SPECTRUM
DISORDERS/RASOPATHIES
I.
Prenatal diagnosis for Noonan spectrum disorders/RASopathies, via amniocentesis, CVS,
or PUBS, using a Noonan syndrome panel (81404, 81405, 81406, 81407, 81479, 81442,
81265, 88235) may be considered medically necessary when:
A. The member’s/enrollee’s current pregnancy has had a normal karyotype and/or
microarray, AND
B. The member/enrollee meets one of the following*:
1. The member’s/enrollee’s current pregnancy has an ultrasound finding of
increased nuchal translucency or cystic hygroma of at least 5.0 mm in the
first trimester, OR
2. The member’s/enrollee’s current pregnancy has both of the following:
a) An increased nuchal translucency of at least 3.5mm, AND
b) One of the following ultrasound findings:
(1) Distended jugular lymph sacs (JLS), OR
(2) Hydrops fetalis, OR
(3) Polyhydramnios, OR
(4) Pleural effusion, OR
(5) Cardiac defects (e.g., pulmonary valve stenosis,
atrioventricular septal defect, coarctation of the aorta,
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, atrial septal defect, etc.),
AND
C. The panel being ordered includes, at a minimum, the following genes: PTPN11,
RAF1, RIT1, SOS1, AND
D. Alternate etiologies have been considered and ruled out when possible (e.g.,
environmental exposure, injury, infection, maternal condition), AND
E. The panel has been ordered by and the member/enrollee has received genetic
counseling from one of the following (who is not affiliated with the commercial
testing laboratory, if applicable):
10
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
1. A board-certified medical geneticist
2. Maternal-fetal medicine specialist/perinatologist
3. A board-certified OBGYN
4. A board-certified genetic counselor
5. An advanced practice practitioner in genetics or maternal-fetal
medicine/perinatology
II.
Prenatal diagnosis for Noonan spectrum disorders/RASopathies, via amniocentesis, CVS,
or PUBS, using a Noonan syndrome panel (81404, 81405, 81406, 81407, 81479, 81442,
81265, 88235) is considered investigational for all other indications.
back to top
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS FOR SKELETAL DYSPLASIAS
I.
Prenatal diagnosis for skeletal dysplasias, via amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS, using a
skeletal dysplasia panel (81404, 81405, 81408, 81479, 81265, 88235) may be considered
medically necessary when:
A. The member’s/enrollee’s current pregnancy has any of the following ultrasound
findings:
1. Long bones less than 5th percentile, OR
2. Poor mineralization of the calvarium, OR
3. Fractures of long bones (particularly femora), OR
4. Bent/bowed bones, OR
5. Poor mineralization of the vertebrae, OR
6. Absent/hypoplastic scapula, OR
7. Equinovarus, AND
B. The member’s/enrollee’s current pregnancy has had a normal karyotype and/or
microarray, AND
C. The panel being ordered includes, at a minimum, the following genes: ALPL,
COL1A1, COL1A2, COL2A1, FGFR3, INPPL1, NKX3-2, SLC26A2, SOX9,
TRIP11, AND
11
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
D. The panel has been ordered by and the member/enrollee has received genetic
counseling from one of the following (who is not affiliated with the commercial
testing laboratory, if applicable):
1. A board-certified medical geneticist
2. Maternal-fetal medicine specialist/perinatologist
3. A board-certified OBGYN
4. A board-certified genetic counselor
5. An advanced practice practitioner in genetics or maternal-fetal
medicine/perinatology
II.
Prenatal diagnosis for skeletal dysplasias, via amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS, using a
skeletal dysplasia panel (81404, 81405, 81408, 81479, 81265, 88235) is considered
investigational for all other indications.
back to top
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS VIA EXOME SEQUENCING
I.
Prenatal diagnosis, via amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS, using exome sequencing (81415,
81416, 81265, 88235) may be considered medically necessary when:
A. The member’s/enrollee’s current pregnancy has either of the following:
1. Non-immune hydrops fetalis, OR
2. Two or more major malformations on ultrasound, which are affecting
different organ systems (see definitions), AND
B. The member’s/enrollee’s current pregnancy has had a karyotype and/or
microarray performed and the results were negative/normal, AND
C. Alternate etiologies have been considered and ruled out when possible (examples:
environmental exposure, injury, infection, maternal condition), AND
D. Postnatal testing may not be feasible due to poor prognosis and increased risk of
neonatal demise, AND
E. The panel has been ordered by and the member/enrollee has received genetic
counseling from one of the following (who is not affiliated with the commercial
testing laboratory, if applicable):
12
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
1. A board-certified medical geneticist
2. Maternal-fetal medicine specialist/perinatologist
3. A board-certified OBGYN
4. A board-certified genetic counselor
5. An advanced practice practitioner in genetics or maternal-fetal
medicine/perinatology
II.
Prenatal diagnosis, via amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS, using exome sequencing (81415,
81416, 81265, 88235) is considered investigational for all other indications.
back to top
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS VIA GENOME SEQUENCING
II.
Prenatal diagnosis, via amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS, using genome sequencing (81425,
81426, 81427, 88235, 81265, 0335U, 0336U) is considered investigational.
back to top
NOTES AND DEFINITIONS
1. Major malformations are structural defects that have a significant effect on function or
appearance. They may be lethal or associated with possible survival with severe or
moderate immediate or long-term morbidity. Examples by organ system include:
● Genitourinary: renal agenesis (unilateral or bilateral), hypoplastic/cystic kidney
●
Cardiovascular: complex heart malformations (such as pulmonary valve stenosis,
tetralogy of fallot, transposition of the great arteries, coarctation of the aorta,
hypoplastic left heart syndrome
Musculoskeletal: osteochondrodysplasia/osteogenesis imperfecta, clubfoot,
craniosynostosis
Central nervous system: anencephaly, hydrocephalus, myelomeningocele
Body wall: omphalocele/gastroschisis
Respiratory: cystic adenomatoid lung malformation
●
●
●
●
2. Amniocentesis is a procedure in which a sample of amniotic fluid is removed from the
uterus for prenatal diagnostic testing.
3. Chorionic Villi Sampling (CVS) is a procedure where a sample of chorionic villi is
removed from the placenta for prenatal diagnostic testing.
13
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
4. Percutaneous Umbilical Cord Blood Sampling (PUBS) is a procedure where a sample
of fetal blood is extracted from the vein in the umbilical cord.
CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS
The decision to elect a prenatal diagnostic test and/or genetic testing following pregnancy loss
should be made jointly by the mother and/or parents and the treating clinician. Genetic
counseling, including facilitation of decision making, is strongly recommended.
In most cases, prenatal genetic testing for single gene disorders using molecular genetic testing
requires knowledge of the familial genetic variant which has been identified in a family member
(e.g., biological mother, biological father, and/or sibling).
back to top
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
Chromosomal FISH (Aneuploidy) Analysis
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)
An ACOG practice practice bulletin (#162, 2016) states the following:
“Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis uses fluorescent-labeled probes for specific
chromosomes or chromosomal regions to identify the number of those chromosome regions that
are present in a specimen. Fluorescence in situ hybridization can be performed on uncultured
cells collected by amniocentesis or CVS to provide an assessment of the common
aneuploidies…” (p. 3)
“If a patient is at increased risk of having offspring with trisomy 13, 18, or 21 based on abnormal
serum screening or cell-free DNA testing, amniocentesis with FISH plus karyotype or with
karyotype alone should be offered…” (p. 7)
“If a structural abnormality is strongly suggestive of a particular aneuploidy in the fetus (eg,
duodenal atresia or an atrioventricular heart defect, which are characteristic of trisomy 21),
karyotype with or without FISH may be offered before chromosomal microarray analysis…” (p.
3)
14
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
“An abnormal FISH result should not be considered diagnostic. Therefore, clinical decision
making based on information from FISH should include at least one of the following additional
results: confirmatory traditional metaphase chromosome analysis or chromosomal microarray, or
consistent clinical information (such as abnormal ultrasonographic findings or a positive
screening test result for Down syndrome or trisomy 18).” (p. 10 to 11)
back to top
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) for Prenatal Diagnosis
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)
An ACOG practice practice bulletin (#162, 2016) states the following:
● Chromosomal aberrations that are smaller than the resolution of conventional karyotype
also can result in phenotypic anomalies; these copy number variants can be detected in
the fetus using chromosomal microarray analysis. When structural abnormalities are
detected by prenatal ultrasound examination, chromosomal micro- array will identify
clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities in approximately 6% of the fetuses that
have a normal karyotype (11, 12). For this reason, chromosomal microarray analysis
should be recommended as the primary test (replacing conventional karyotype) for
patients undergoing prenatal diagnosis for the indication of a fetal structural abnormality
detected by ultrasound examination (10). If a structural abnormality is strongly
suggestive of a particular aneuploidy in the fetus (eg, duodenal atresia or an
atrioventricular heart defect, which are characteristic of trisomy 21), karyotype with or
without FISH may be offered before chromosomal microarray analysis. (page 3)
● Chromosomal microarray analysis has been found to detect a pathogenic (or likely
pathogenic) copy number variant in approximately 1.7% of patients with a normal
ultrasound examination and a normal karyotype (11), and it is recommended that
chromosomal microarray analysis be made available to any patient choosing to undergo
invasive diagnostic testing. (page 3)
back to top
Conventional Karyotype Analysis for Prenatal Diagnosis
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and Society for Maternal Fetal
Medicine (SMFM)
A recent ACOG and SMFM practice bulletin (#226, 2020) states the following:
“Prenatal genetic screening (serum screening with or without nuchal translucency [NT] ultrasound
or cell-free DNA screening) and diagnostic testing (chorionic villus sampling [CVS] or
15
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
amniocentesis) options should be discussed and offered to all pregnant women regardless of
maternal age or risk of chromosomal abnormality.” (p. 16)
“Each patient should be counseled in each pregnancy about options for testing for fetal
chromosomal abnormalities. It is important that obstetric care professionals be prepared to discuss
not only the risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities but also the relative benefits and limitations of
the available screening and diagnostic tests.” (p. 1)
back to top
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) for Pregnancy Loss
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and Society for Maternal Fetal
Medicine (SMFM)
Because of the advantages chromosomal microarray has over karyotyping (chromosome
analysis), ACOG and SMFM support the following for pregnancy loss in their 2016 (reaffirmed
2020) statement:
"Chromosomal microarray analysis of fetal tissue (ie, amniotic fluid, placenta, or products of
conception) is recommended in the evaluation of intrauterine fetal death or stillbirth when further
cytogenetic analysis is desired because of the test’s increased likelihood of obtaining results and
improved detection of causative abnormalities." (p. e263)
American Society for Reproductive Medicine
The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2012) issued an opinion on the evaluation
and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss. The statement drew multiple conclusions, one of
which states: “Evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss can proceed after 2 consecutive clinical
pregnancy losses." (p. 1108)
Papas and Kutteh (2021)
A review published in the Application of Clinical Genetics in 2021 by Papas and Kutteh
recommends that genetic testing on products of conception should be performed after the second
and subsequent pregnancy loss. Chromosome microarray is the preferred testing method. (p.
321)
Conventional Karyotype Analysis for Pregnancy Loss
American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)
back to top
16
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
According to the ASRM’s 2012 statement, recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is defined as occurring
"after two consecutive clinical pregnancy losses….Karyotypic analysis of products of conception
may be useful in the setting of ongoing therapy for RPL." (p. 1108 and 1109) For the purposes of
this committee, the ASRM defines clinical pregnancy as “...documented by ultrasonography or
histopathological examination.” (p. 1103)
Exome or Genome Sequencing for Pregnancy Loss
Zhao, C. et al, 2020
“…this study demonstrated that 22–35% of pregnancy losses have variants of diagnostic value in
genes that may contribute to fetal death, supporting the use of Exome Sequencing as a valuable
genetic testing tool in searching for a cause for pregnancy loss. The identification of variants of
diagnostic value provides necessary information for follow-up parental studies, prenatal genetic
counseling, recurrence risk assessment, and management of subsequent pregnancies. The
detection of multiple disease categories and recurrent genes and variants associated with fetal
death indicated multiple etiologies for early pregnancy loss. However, further clinicopathologic
investigation and functional analysis are needed to determine the cause of fetal death. This could
lead to better understanding of the functions of these OMIM genes in fetal development and their
roles in pregnancy loss.”(p. 441 to 442)
back to top
Prenatal Diagnosis for Single-Gene Disorders
National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC)
The National Society of Genetic Counselors updated a position statement (2019) regarding
prenatal testing for adult-onset conditions, stating the following:
“The National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) does not recommend prenatal genetic
testing for known adult-onset conditions if pregnancy or childhood management will not be
affected. Due to potential medical and ethical complexities, NSGC recommends that prior to
undergoing testing, prospective parents meet with a genetic counselor or other healthcare
specialists with genetics expertise to discuss the implications of prenatal testing for adult-onset
conditions. Pre-test counseling should include a discussion of the natural history of the condition,
availability of treatments or interventions, concerns that prenatal testing for adult-onset
conditions may deny a child’s future autonomy, and potential for genetic discrimination.”
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)
17
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) practice bulletin 162 (2016)
states the following:
“All pregnant women should be offered prenatal assessment for aneuploidy by screening or
diagnostic testing regardless of maternal age or other risk factors.”
Patients with an increased risk of a fetal genetic disorder include those in the following
categories: Older maternal age, older paternal age, prior child with structural birth defect,
previous fetus or child with autosomal trisomy or sex chromosome aneuploidy, structural
anomalies identified by ultrasonography, parental carrier of chromosome rearrangement, parental
aneuploidy or aneuploidy mosaicism, parental carrier of a genetic disorder, and biological parent
who is affected by an autosomal dominant disorder. (p. 5).
back to top
Prenatal Diagnosis for Noonan Spectrum Disorders/RASopathies
Stuurman KE, Joosten M, van der Burgt I, et al, 2019
This cohort study of ultrasound findings of 424 fetuses in the Netherlands concluded with the
recommendation for “testing of fetuses with solely an increased NT after chromosomal
abnormalities have been excluded when the NT is greater than or equal to 5.0 mm. We also
recommend testing when the NT is greater than or equal to 3.5 mm and at least one of the
following anomalies is present: distended jugular lymph sacs (JLS), hydrops fetalis,
polyhydramnios, pleural effusion and cardiac defects.” (p. 660)
“In general, an NGS panel of known rasopathy genes should be used when a rasopathy is
suspected. Although we did not find pathogenic variants in every gene in the panel, in all genes,
a prenatal phenotype has been documented in literature. Therefore, a smaller panel is not
advisable. However, in countries where an extensive panel is not available, testing for only
PTPN11 gene would catch of at least 50% of the fetuses with a rasopathy.” (p. 661)
GeneReviews: Noonan Syndrome
GeneReviews is an expert-authored review of current literature on a genetic disease, and goes
through a rigorous editing and peer review process before being published online. The clinical
summary for Noonan Syndrome gives the following prenatal features (Roberts, 2022):
● Polyhydramnios
●
Lymphatic dysplasia including increased distended jugular lymphatic sacs, nuchal
translucency, cystic hygroma, pleural effusion, and ascites
Relative macrocephaly
●
18
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
● Cardiac and renal anomalies
The author points out that 3% to 15% of chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal
translucency have PTPN11-associated Noonan syndrome.
back to top
Prenatal Diagnosis for Skeletal Dysplasias
Krakow et al 2009
A guideline for prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasias (Krakow, Lachman, Rimoin, 2009)
recommends the follow criteria:
●
● Fetuses with long bone measurements at or less than the 5th centile or greater than 3 SD
below the mean should be evaluated in a center with expertise in the recognition of
skeletal dysplasias. If the patient cannot travel, arrangements may be able to be made for
evaluation of ultrasound videotapes or hard copy images. (p. 5)
The following fetal ultrasound measurements should be visualized and plotted against
normative values: fetal cranium (biparietal diameter and head circumference), facial
profile, mandible, clavicle, scapula, chest circumference, vertebral bodies, all fetal long
bones, and the hands and feet. Fetuses with long bone parameters greater than 3 SD
below the mean should be strongly suspected of having a skeletal dysplasia, especially if
the head circumference is greater than the 75th centile. (p. 5)
Lethality should be determined by chest circumference to abdominal circumference ratio
and/or femur length to abdominal circumference measurement ratio. A chest-to
abdominal circumference ratio of <0.6 or femur length to abdominal circumference ratio
of 0.16 strongly suggests a perinatal lethal disorder, although there are exceptions. The
findings should be conveyed to the physicians caring for the patient and to the patient. (p.
5)
●
The guidelines also state:
●
● “Molecular testing should be offered in those pregnancies at-risk for homozygosity or
compound heterozygosity for skeletal dysplasias. Both parents’ mutations should have
been identified, ideally before pregnancy.” (p. 5)
“Individuals with skeletal dysplasias known to be due to a number of different mutations
should be encouraged to obtain molecular analysis before pregnancy.” (p. 5)
“In cases where molecular testing is performed and ultrasound findings suggest a lethal
prognosis, then counseling should be based on clinical findings and molecular testing
should be considered to confirm the clinical findings.” (p. 5)
“In addition, close attention should be paid to the shape and mineralization pattern of the
fetal calvarium and fetal skeleton (poor or ectopic mineralization). Determining the
●
●
19
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
elements of the skeleton that are abnormal, coupled with the findings of mineralization
and shape of the bones can aid in diagnosis.” (p. 3)
back to top
Prenatal Diagnosis via Exome Sequencing
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
ACMG issued a statement on the use of fetal exome sequencing in prenatal diagnosis (2020) that
included the following points to consider:
● “Exome sequencing may be considered for a fetus with ultrasound anomalies when
standard CMA and karyotype analysis have failed to yield a definitive diagnosis. If a
specific diagnosis is suspected, molecular testing for the suggested disorder (with single-
gene test or gene panel) should be the initial test. At the present time, there are no data
supporting the clinical use for ES for other reproductive indications, such as the
identification of sonographic markers suggestive of aneuploidy or a history of recurrent
unexplained pregnancy loss.” (p. 676)
“Pretest counseling is ideally provided by a genetics professional during which the types
of variants that may be returned in a laboratory report for all tested family members
would be reviewed. Both pretest counseling” (p. 676)
“With the use of prenatal ES, the turnaround time has to be rapid to maintain all aspects
of reproductive choice. A rapid turnaround time has been demonstrated in the postnatal
setting for critical genetic diagnoses in a pediatric and neonatal setting. Laboratories
offering prenatal ES should have clearly defined turnaround times for this time-sensitive
test.” (p. 677)
“Post-test counseling is recommended, regardless of the test result. It should be provided
by individuals with relevant expertise, preferably a genetics professional.” (p. 678)
●
●
●
Sparks et al 2020
A large case series published in the New England Journal of Medicine evaluated 127 cases of
unexplained nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) via exome sequencing. (p. 1746) Non-
diagnostic karyotype or chromosome microarray was a requirement for eligibility in the study.
(p. 1747) Diagnostic genetic variants were found in 29% of cases. (p. 1746) Therefore, the
authors conclude with the following: “These data support the use of exome sequencing for NIHF
cases with non-diagnostic results of chromosomal microarray analysis or karyotype analysis in
order to inform prognosis, establish recurrence risk, and direct prenatal and postnatal clinical
care.” (p. 1755)
back to top
20
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
Prenatal Diagnosis Via Whole Genome Sequencing
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and Society for Maternal Fetal
Medicine (SMFM)
ACOG and SMFM (2016, reaffirmed in 2020) issued a committee opinion No. 682 which
included the following conclusions and recommendations for the use of chromosomal microarray
testing and next-generation sequencing in prenatal diagnosis. Note that while whole exome
sequencing is addressed in this opinion, whole genome sequencing is not yet recommended:
“Whole-exome sequencing also is a broad molecular diagnostic approach to identify the etiology
for fetal abnormalities, and whole-exome sequencing of fetal DNA obtained by amniocentesis,
chorionic villi, or umbilical cord blood is being offered on a research basis in some laboratories
and for specific clinical indications in other laboratories. Published data on the prenatal
applications of whole-exome sequencing are limited to case series and case reports. However,
these series suggest that a genomic abnormality may be identified in up to 20 to 30% of fetuses
with multiple anomalies for which standard genetic testing results (ie, karyotype, microarray, or
both) are normal. These cases illustrate how whole-exome sequencing potentially may be used to
provide families with a definitive diagnosis, accurate estimates of recurrence risk, and even the
options of preimplantation genetic testing or early prenatal diagnosis in a future pregnancy.”
Zhou J, Yang Z, Sun J, et al. 2021
“Whole exome sequencing (WES), which detects SNVs, INDELs, and CNVs covering multiple
exons, has been proven to be a powerful tool in prenatal diagnosis. In clinical practice, WES can
be conducted in CMA-negative cases to further search for single-base lesions. Emerging studies
have shown that WES has a detection rate of 8.5% to 10% in fetal structural abnormalities with
normal karyotype and CMA results. CMA followed by WES considerably increases the
diagnostic yield, and is increasingly accepted as a routine test strategy in clinical practice;
however, given the time-sensitive nature of the prenatal stage and the potential inaccessibility of
adequate fetal samples, sequential testing is time-consuming and requires a large amount of
DNA as input. More importantly, it is unable to detect certain types of variation, such as
balanced translocation or noncoding SNVs/INDELs. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has the
potential to detect almost all types of genomic variants with a low input-DNA requirement (≈100
ng) and is proposed to be beneficial in prenatal diagnosis.” (p. 1)
“… with a rapid TAT, good diagnostic yield, and less DNA required, WGS could be an
alternative test in lieu of two separate analyses as it has an equivalent diagnostic yield to that of
CMA plus WES and provides comprehensive detection of various genomic variants in fetuses
further evaluation are warranted to demonstrate the value of WGS in prenatal diagnosis.” (p. 12)
21
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
Reviews, Revisions, and Approvals
Policy developed
REFERENCES
back to top
Revision
Date
03/23
Approval
Date
03/23
1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Evaluation and
treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril.
2012;98(5):1103-1111. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.048
2. Committee on Genetics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Committee Opinion
No.682: Microarrays and Next-Generation Sequencing Technology: The Use of
Advanced Genetic Diagnostic Tools in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstet Gynecol.
2016;128(6):e262-e268. Reaffirmed 2020. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001817
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice
Bulletins—Obstetrics; Committee on Genetics; Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine.
Practice Bulletin No. 162: Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Genetic Disorders. Obstet
Gynecol. 2016;127(5):e108-e122. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001405
4. Krakow D, Lachman RS, Rimoin DL. Guidelines for the prenatal diagnosis of fetal
skeletal dysplasias. Genet Med. 2009;11(2):127-133.
doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181971ccb
5. Monaghan KG, Leach NT, Pekarek D, Prasad P, Rose NC; ACMG Professional Practice
and Guidelines Committee. The use of fetal exome sequencing in prenatal diagnosis: a
points to consider document of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
(ACMG). Genet Med. 2020;22(4):675-680. doi:10.1038/s41436-019-0731-7
6. Sparks TN, Lianoglou BR, Adami RR, et al. Exome Sequencing for Prenatal Diagnosis in
Nonimmune Hydrops Fetalis [published online ahead of print, 2020 Oct 7]. N Engl J
Med. 2020;10.1056/NEJMoa2023643. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2023643
7. “Prenatal Testing for Adult-Onset Condition”. Position Statement from National Society
for Genetic Counselors. https://www.nsgc.org/Policy-Research-and-
Publications/Position-Statements/Position-Statements/Post/prenatal-testing-for-adult-
onset-conditions-1. Released October 9, 2018. Updated June 26, 2019.
8. Stuurman KE, Joosten M, van der Burgt I, et al. Prenatal ultrasound findings of
rasopathies in a cohort of 424 fetuses: update on genetic testing in the NGS era. J Med
Genet. 2019;56(10):654-661. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105746
9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—
Obstetrics; Committee on Genetics; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Screening for
22
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 226. Obstet Gynecol.
2020;136(4):e48-e69. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004084
10. Roberts AE. Noonan Syndrome. 2001 Nov 15 [Updated 2022 Feb 17]. In: Adam MP,
Everman DB, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA):
University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2023. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1124/
11. Papas RS, Kutteh WH. Genetic testing for aneuploidy in patients who have had multiple
miscarriages: a review of current literature. Appl Clin Genet. 2021;14:321-329.
12. Zhou J, Yang Z, Sun J, et al. Whole Genome Sequencing in the Evaluation of Fetal
Structural Anomalies: A Parallel Test with Chromosomal Microarray Plus Whole Exome
Sequencing. Genes. 2021; 12(3):376. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030376
back to top
Important Reminder
This clinical policy has been developed by appropriately experienced and licensed health care
professionals based on a review and consideration of currently available generally accepted
standards of medical practice; peer-reviewed medical literature; government agency/program
approval status; evidence-based guidelines and positions of leading national health professional
organizations; views of physicians practicing in relevant clinical areas affected by this clinical
policy; and other available clinical information. The Health Plan makes no representations and
accepts no liability with respect to the content of any external information used or relied upon in
developing this clinical policy. This clinical policy is consistent with standards of medical
practice current at the time that this clinical policy was approved. “Health Plan” means a health
plan that has adopted this clinical policy and that is operated or administered, in whole or in part,
by Centene Management Company, LLC, or any of such health plan’s affiliates, as applicable.
The purpose of this clinical policy is to provide a guide to medical necessity, which is a
component of the guidelines used to assist in making coverage decisions and administering
benefits. It does not constitute a contract or guarantee regarding payment or results. Coverage
decisions and the administration of benefits are subject to all terms, conditions, exclusions and
limitations of the coverage documents (e.g., evidence of coverage, certificate of coverage, policy,
contract of insurance, etc.), as well as to state and federal requirements and applicable Health
Plan-level administrative policies and procedures.
This clinical policy is effective as of the date determined by the Health Plan. The date of posting
may not be the effective date of this clinical policy. This clinical policy may be subject to
applicable legal and regulatory requirements relating to provider notification. If there is a
discrepancy between the effective date of this clinical policy and any applicable legal or
regulatory requirement, the requirements of law and regulation shall govern. The Health Plan
23
Concert Genetic Testing: Prenatal Diagnosis (via Amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS) and
Pregnancy Loss
V2.2023
Date of Last Revision: 3/1/2023
retains the right to change, amend or withdraw this clinical policy, and additional clinical
policies may be developed and adopted as needed, at any time.
This clinical policy does not constitute medical advice, medical treatment or medical care. It is
not intended to dictate to providers how to practice medicine. Providers are expected to exercise
professional medical judgment in providing the most appropriate care, and are solely responsible
for the medical advice and treatment of members/enrollees. This clinical policy is not intended to
recommend treatment for members/enrollees. Members/enrollees should consult with their
treating physician in connection with diagnosis and treatment decisions.
Providers referred to in this clinical policy are independent contractors who exercise independent
judgment and over whom the Health Plan has no control or right of control. Providers are not
agents or employees of the Health Plan.
This clinical policy is the property of the Health Plan. Unauthorized copying, use, and
distribution of this clinical policy or any information contained herein are strictly prohibited.
Providers, members/enrollees and their representatives are bound to the terms and conditions
expressed herein through the terms of their contracts. Where no such contract exists, providers,
members/enrollees and their representatives agree to be bound by such terms and conditions by
providing services to members/enrollees and/or submitting claims for payment for such services.
Note: For Medicaid members/enrollees, when state Medicaid coverage provisions conflict
with the coverage provisions in this clinical policy, state Medicaid coverage provisions take
precedence. Please refer to the state Medicaid manual for any coverage provisions pertaining to
this clinical policy.
Note: For Medicare members/enrollees, to ensure consistency with the Medicare National
Coverage Determinations (NCD) and Local Coverage Determinations (LCD), all applicable
NCDs, LCDs, and Medicare Coverage Articles should be reviewed prior to applying the criteria
set forth in this clinical policy. Refer to the CMS website at http://www.cms.gov for additional
information.
©2023 Centene Corporation. All rights reserved. All materials are exclusively owned by Centene
Corporation and are protected by United States copyright law and international copyright
law. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied, modified, distributed, displayed,
stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form or by any means, or otherwise published
without the prior written permission of Centene Corporation. You may not alter or remove any
trademark, copyright or other notice contained herein. Centene® and Centene Corporation® are
registered trademarks exclusively owned by Centene Corporation.
24