Humana Gastric Pacing/Gastric Electrical Stimulation - Medicare Advantage Form

Effective Date

01/01/2024

Last Reviewed

NA

Original Document

  Reference



There are no NCDs or LCDs for Gastric Pacing/Gastric Electrical Stimulation

Description

Gastric pacing (also known as gastric electrical stimulation) is a treatment for an individual with chronic, intractable or drug-refractory nausea and vomiting secondary to gastroparesis, which could be caused by diabetes or idiopathic (unknown) reasons. A gastric pacing system delivers electrical stimulation to the gastric muscles by means of two leads that are implanted directly into the stomach and connected to a generator that is implanted into the abdominal area. The electrical impulses that are delivered to the gastric muscles are intended to stimulate gastric myoelectric activity with the goal of improving stomach emptying and relieving symptoms.4 The device is regulated by an external programmer that noninvasively adjusts the level of gastric stimulation and allows the device to be completely turned off at any time. Internal battery replacement is required every 5 to 10 years. The Enterra Therapy II system is approved under a Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) by the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and is the only gastric pacing system approved for marketing.

A temporary trial of gastric pacing is being investigated to determine the response and benefit of this treatment prior to placing a permanent device. A cannula with an internal needle is inserted through the skin and placed in the gastric submucosa. A self-anchoring electrode is passed through the needle, which delivers electrical stimulation up to 8 weeks.

Coverage Determination

Humana follows the CMS requirements that only allows coverage and payment for services that are reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member except as specifically allowed by Medicare.

In interpreting or supplementing the criteria above and in order to determine medical necessity consistently, Humana may consider the criteria contained in the following:

Gastric pacing will be considered medically reasonable and necessary when ALL the following criteria are met:

  • Chronic, intractable nausea and vomiting secondary to gastroparesis of diabetic or idiopathic etiology; AND
  • Diagnosis confirmed by gastric emptying scintigraphy and/or radiopaque marker testing; AND
  • Refractory or intolerant to diet modification and pharmaceutical therapy (eg, antiemetics, prokinetics)

Gastric pacing revision or removal of previously approved implantation will be considered medically reasonable and necessary for complications associated with gastric pacing (eg, bowel obstruction, gastric wall perforation, infection, lead dislodgement or lead erosion into the small intestine).

Replacement of a gastric pacing device will be considered medically reasonable and necessary if required for battery depletion (generally no more frequently than every 5 to 10 years).

The use of the criteria in this Medicare Advantage Medical Coverage Policy provides clinical benefits highly likely to outweigh any clinical harms. Services that do not meet the criteria above are not medically necessary and thus do not provide a clinical benefit. Medically unnecessary services carry risks of adverse outcomes and may interfere with the pursuit of other treatments which have demonstrated efficacy.

Coverage Limitations

US Government Publishing Office. Electronic code of federal regulations: part 411 – 42 CFR § 411.15 - Particular services excluded from coverage

The following gastric pacing indications will not be considered medically reasonable and necessary:

  • Initial treatment for gastroparesis; OR
  • Temporary trial of gastric pacing; OR
  • Treatment of obesity

A review of the current medical literature shows that the evidence is insufficient to determine that this service is standard medical treatment for these indications.

There remains an absence of randomized, blinded clinical studies examining benefit and long-term clinical outcomes establishing the value of this service in clinical management for these indications.

Summary of Evidence

A review of the current medical literature demonstrates a lack of evidence or unclear utility regarding the use of gastric pacing for the initial treatment of gastroparesis. Gastric electrical stimulation should only be used for the treatment of chronic, intractable (drug refractory) nausea and vomiting secondary to gastroparesis of diabetic or idiopathic etiology.8,9

There is a lack of evidence to support the use of a temporary trial of gastric pacing. The FDA approval of the only available device (Enterra) states it is indicated for the treatment of chronic, intractable (drug refractory) nausea and vomiting secondary to gastroparesis of diabetic or idiopathic etiology. The indications do not reference the use of a temporary trial.9 There were no recommendations from the American College of Gastroenterology guidelines. The American Gastroenterological Association states temporary electrical stimulation may predict a response to gastric electrical stimulation and if available, should be offered. However, this statement was based on only one clinical trial of 58 subjects in which it was concluded that overall treatment effects were not significant.2

There are no FDA approved gastric electrical stimulation devices for the treatment of obesity.